GEELY

GEELY 00175.HK Price

Closed
GEELY
$0
+$0(%0,00)
No data

*Data last updated: 2026-04-19 13:07 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-19 13:07, GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY) is priced at $0, with a total market cap of --, a P/E ratio of 0,00, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $0 and $0. The current price is %0,00 above the day's low and %0,00 below the day's high, with a trading volume of --. Over the past 52 weeks, GEELY has traded between $0 to $0, and the current price is %0,00 away from the 52-week high.

GEELY Key Stats

P/E Ratio0,00
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Shares Outstanding0,00

GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY) FAQ

What's the stock price of GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY) today?

x
GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY) is currently trading at $0, with a 24h change of %0,00. The 52-week trading range is $0–$0.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY)?

x

Should you buy or sell GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY)?

x

How to buy GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Hot Posts About GEELY 00175.HK (GEELY)

GateUser-bd883c58

GateUser-bd883c58

04-18 03:30
Ask AI · How does geopolitical risk push oil stocks higher against the market? On April 2, Hong Kong stocks fluctuated and moved lower, **the Hang Seng Index closed down 0.7%, and the Hang Seng Tech Index fell 1.63%.** **Weighted tech stocks fell,** Xiaomi Group fell more than 3%, and Alibaba fell more than 3%. **AI application stocks led the decline,** Zhipu fell nearly 15%, and MINIMAX-W fell more than 10%. **Chip stocks generally fell across the board,** Shanghai Fudan fell more than 7%, HuaHong Semiconductor fell more than 5%, and SMIC fell more than 3%. **The auto sector strengthened,** Chery Automobile rose more than 15%, Geely Automobile rose more than 8%, and Great Wall Motors rose more than 7%. > **On the news front,** according to Cailian Press, data on March deliveries for multiple new energy vehicle companies showed a clear rebound. Leapmotor delivered 50,029 vehicles in March, up 34.87% year over year and up 78.25% month over month, continuing its leading position among “new forces”; Li Auto delivered 41,053 new vehicles in March, with year-on-year and month-on-month growth of 11.94% and 55.38%, respectively. Also exceeding quarterly guidance was NIO: in March, NIO completed deliveries of 35,486 vehicles, up 135.96% year over year and up 70.63% month over month. **The oil and petrochemical sector surged,** Changying Group (Holdings) rose more than 18%, Shandong Molong rose more than 16%, and Yuanheng Gas, Baijin Oil Service, and others also rose. > **On the news front,** according to CCTV News, on April 2, U.S. President Trump said that in the past the United States did not need the Strait of Hormuz, and it does not need it now. In addition, Trump said that once an agreement cannot be reached, the U.S. will launch a fierce attack on all power plants in Iran. Trump also said the U.S. is carrying out close monitoring and control of these facilities via satellites. If any abnormal movement is detected by the other side, the U.S. will immediately launch missiles to deliver a “destructive” strike. #### Individual stock movements #### Brainwave Aurora-B once surged more than 14% during intraday trading On April 2, Brainwave Aurora-B once surged more than 14% during intraday trading, closing up 2.86%. On the news front, Brainwave Aurora-B released an announcement on the morning of April 2, stating that the company has recently officially become a strategic cooperation unit of the Beijing Frontier Brain-Computer Interface Research Institute. #### Changfei Optical Fiber Cable once rose to nearly 8% during intraday trading On April 2, Hong Kong’s fiber optic concept stocks strengthened again. Changfei Optical Fiber Cable once rose to nearly 8% during intraday trading. As of 13:08, the stock was up 4.14%. On the news front, recently, Changfei Optical Fiber Cable released its 2025 performance showing that in 2025, the company achieved revenue of 14.252 billion yuan, up 16.85% year over year, and net profit attributable to the parent of 814 million yuan, up 20.40% year over year. Among them, in the fourth quarter, the company achieved net profit attributable to the parent of 344 million yuan, up 234.23% year over year. #### March sales up 15% year over year; Chery Automobile rose more than 15% On April 2, Chery Automobile traded higher amid fluctuations, closing up 15.26%. On the news front, Chery Automobile announced on April 1 that its March monthly vehicle sales were 228,000 vehicles, up 15% year over year; cumulative sales for the first quarter totaled 566,000 vehicles.
0
0
0
0
GateUser-bd883c58

GateUser-bd883c58

04-16 21:55
Ask AI · How Will Robotaxi Autonomous Testing Reshape the Shared Mobility Industry Landscape? **Cover Source** | **Company Provided Image** On April 1st, Cao Cao Mobility received approval from relevant regulatory authorities, becoming the first company in Hangzhou to conduct Robotaxi autonomous road testing. This milestone signifies a breakthrough in its Robotaxi technology capabilities, officially entering a new phase of autonomous operation. Just a few days ago, Cao Cao Mobility announced its full-year 2025 performance. Data shows that the company's service coverage has expanded to 195 cities nationwide, with full-year revenue reaching 20.2 billion yuan, a 38% increase year-over-year; gross profit margin rose to 9.4%, up 1.3 percentage points. **More notably, the Q4 financial data shows the company’s adjusted net profit turning positive, achieving a historic single-quarter turnaround from loss to profit.** Meanwhile, cash flow indicators also sent positive signals, with the company's annual operating cash flow increasing by 60.3% year-over-year. This means Cao Cao Mobility has completely moved beyond the stage of relying on external funding and now possesses genuine self-sustaining and endogenous growth capabilities. In China's shared mobility landscape, Cao Cao Mobility has always been a unique presence. It is **not only a pioneer in customized vehicle models but also Geely Holding’s “ultimate move” in the trillion-yuan Robotaxi track**. This industry synergy endows it with the underlying logic to reshape the cost structure of mobility. So, how has Cao Cao Mobility achieved profitability turnaround? How will Robotaxi reshape the company's long-term value? **Profitability Turning Point Confirmed** ---------- From continuous losses to a single-quarter profit, the fundamental change in Cao Cao Mobility’s profit structure is mainly due to a strong increase in gross margin. But what are the drivers behind Cao Cao Mobility’s gross margin growth? Using the simplified profit model “Gross Margin = [1 - (Sales and Marketing Expenses) / GTV]” as a basis to analyze Cao Cao Mobility’s financial reports, it becomes clear that its strong gross margin rebound is primarily determined by the following three factors: **1. Scale effects and brand premium becoming evident.** Specifically, the company’s average monthly active users reached 41.3 million, up 43.9% year-over-year; average monthly active drivers reached 631k, up 35.4%. **2. Efficiency improvements enabled by AI.** According to disclosures, its transaction engine “Cao Cao Brain” continuously applies AI technology to optimize algorithms, improving order dispatch efficiency. User subsidies are a significant cost component for Cao Cao Mobility, so reductions in this area have also strongly contributed to gross margin recovery. **3. Depreciation amortization effects under the customized vehicle model.** Cao Cao Mobility’s unique customized vehicle model involves its own fleet incurring relatively fixed depreciation costs, which are sensitive to scale effects. As daily platform order volume increases significantly, vehicle utilization rises, effectively spreading out depreciation costs per vehicle. Although depreciation expenses constitute a small part of Cao Cao Mobility’s cost structure, they still contribute to gross margin improvement. Additionally, from the expense ratio perspective, as operational efficiency improves across the board, cost optimization also frees up some profit space. Regarding sales expense ratio, in the context of the entire shared mobility industry’s online aggregation platform order growth, Cao Cao Mobility’s sales expense ratio remains roughly flat, reflecting its brand premium. Overall, whether it’s the front-end “volume and price” growth or the back-end “cost and expense” optimization, Cao Cao Mobility is rapidly establishing a healthy profit cycle. Under this increasingly clear “scissors effect,” long-term profit margin improvement is no longer in doubt. **Customized Vehicle Model Runs “Alpha”** ---------------- According to data from Forrester, the growth rate of China’s shared mobility market in 2025 is about 24%. Cao Cao Mobility, with a GTV growth rate of 38%, outperforms the industry average. **The core engine remains its long-standing “customized vehicle” model.** As of December 31, 2025, Cao Cao Mobility had over 38k customized vehicles in 31 cities. The essence of the customized vehicle model is leveraging Geely Holding’s manufacturing capabilities to provide drivers with specially designed vehicles for mobility services, thereby reducing drivers’ total cost of ownership (TCO) and enhancing passenger experience. **This experience-based reduction directly consolidates platform goodwill assets.** With high-quality service, Cao Cao Mobility has been rated “Best Service Reputation” in nine user surveys from Q4 2023 to Q4 2025 among China’s major shared mobility platforms. **This advantage is especially prominent in the current “traffic volume competition” of the “aggregation platform” model.** Since front-end traffic entry points are highly concentrated, the quality of fulfillment at the back end becomes a “black box.” Amid massive homogeneous supply of capacity, Cao Cao Mobility’s control over customized vehicles and standardized services provides a scarce “fulfillment certainty,” creating a strong brand recognition within the aggregation ecosystem, **successfully capturing user mindshare and influencing user choices invisibly.** Beyond capturing user mindshare, the customized vehicle model also remains a key strategy for Cao Cao Mobility’s ongoing city expansion. Currently, the company adopts a **“light-asset on capacity side + customized vehicle expansion in cities”** model to sustain growth. In 2025, by selling customized vehicles to capacity partners, the company operated in 195 cities, which is another major growth driver. **Robotaxi Sets the Valuation Ceiling** ---------------- If the customized vehicle model and refined operations are Cao Cao Mobility’s current foundation, then **Robotaxi is the ceiling that will determine its valuation over the next decade**. **2026 will be a pivotal year for accelerating Robotaxi commercialization.** In North America, Tesla officially launched driverless Robotaxi services in Austin, Texas, and plans to mass-produce the dedicated autonomous taxi Cybercab by April 2026. Another giant, Waymo, completed a $16 billion funding round in February 2026, with a post-investment valuation of $126 billion, aiming to reach 1 million weekly orders by the end of 2026—doubling 2025’s volume. **The domestic Robotaxi market is also progressing rapidly, with Cao Cao Mobility occupying a unique niche.** A complete Robotaxi commercialization chain includes vehicle manufacturing, autonomous driving technology R&D, and fleet operation. Domestic players often focus on one segment, but Cao Cao Mobility’s **“smart customized vehicles + intelligent driving technology + smart operations”** integrated development strategy makes it one of the few global tech mobility platforms with all Robotaxi elements. Looking at its deployment history, in February 2025, the company launched Cao Cao Zhixing autonomous driving platform in Suzhou and Hangzhou, beginning deployment and pilot testing of Robotaxi 1.0 solutions. Less than a year later, in December 2025, the company announced Robotaxi 2.0 solutions, starting to deploy the second-generation Robotaxi, exploring the transition from driver safety operators to fully autonomous operations, roughly in line with companies like Tesla. **In terms of operational scale, as of the announcement, Cao Cao Mobility has deployed over 100 Robotaxis. 2026 is expected to be a “volume-up” period for Cao Cao’s Robotaxi.** According to disclosures, Cao Cao Mobility plans to accelerate deployment of Robotaxi services domestically and internationally, adding more vehicles. Domestically, it aims to expand into more cities for large-scale Robotaxi operations; internationally, it has reached strategic cooperation with Abu Dhabi Investment Office and established a division to develop overseas Robotaxi markets. The company is also exploring Robotaxi development in Hong Kong. On the technological front, leveraging its partnership with Geely Holding, Cao Cao Mobility is accelerating the development of its third-generation L4 fully customized Robotaxi, which is scheduled to be unveiled this year. For Cao Cao Mobility, Robotaxi’s significance is not just about telling an exciting tech story but about this trillion-yuan potential market forming a high degree of synergy with its existing shared mobility network. This is also the core reason why Geely Holding chose Cao Cao Mobility as the primary platform for exploring future mobility and commercializing Robotaxi operations. Turning a profit for the first time is just the beginning. With ongoing financial optimization and the gradual commercialization of Robotaxi, Cao Cao Mobility is telling a new, tech-driven mobility story to the capital markets. *Disclaimer:*
2
0
0
0
MaticHoleFiller

MaticHoleFiller

04-15 08:07
Source: Nanchai Society Yushu Technology's IPO faces an initial setback. On April 1st, the China Securities Industry Association announced the list of companies for on-site inspection in the second batch of 2026, with Yushu Technology and Zhongke Yuhang, both recently accepted on March 20th and 31st, being selected. According to information from the Shanghai Stock Exchange, both companies are IPOs on the STAR Market, sponsored respectively by CITIC Securities and Guotai Haitong Securities. IPO on-site inspections serve as a firewall to prevent companies with "diseases" from passing, and as a "tightening" measure to reinforce the responsibilities of market entities. They also help improve the quality of listed companies from the source. For many years, IPO on-site inspections have been viewed by the market as a "death sentence": from 2021 to 2024, the termination rates of inspected companies were 71.74%, 76.47%, 82.35%, and 50%, respectively. Since 2025, although only Xinmi Technology has withdrawn, inspections still significantly impact the pace of listings—out of 16 companies randomly checked that year, only 7 passed, with the rest still in queue; by contrast, high-quality companies like Mol, from application to registration, took less than 200 days. Yushu Technology, known as the "world's first" humanoid robot shipment volume, will it withstand this on-site inspection and gain regulatory endorsement, or will it be pressed on the pause button? 01 Yushu's Prospectus "Contradicts Common Sense" Low R&D does not match the narrative of hard technology Let's look at the two companies selected for the CSRC's on-site inspection: one is a general-purpose robot company aiming to become the "No. 1 humanoid robot" on the A-share market, and the other is a private launch vehicle company racing to be the "No. 1 commercial aerospace stock." Both are solid tech companies and leaders in their respective fields. The fact that both were simultaneously selected for on-site inspection has led netizens to comment: the CSRC's "random" selection seems to have some substance. But this isn't surprising. Data shows that in the first quarter of this year, only 11 companies in total had their IPOs newly accepted on the A-share market, with 6 on the STAR Market. The other boards had no more than 3 accepted companies each. The Shanghai Stock Exchange had none. For companies applying for a first-time listing, the CSRC regularly conducts two types of on-site inspections: random checks and problem-oriented checks. For newly accepted companies, about 20% are randomly selected for inspection to verify the quality of their filings. Based on this ratio, exactly two companies were selected this time. Since the STAR Market has the highest number of new acceptances, its probability of being selected is naturally the highest. Among the six newly accepted companies on the STAR Market, there are key core technology fields: medical devices (2 companies: Aike Medical, Saikesisi), semiconductors (2 companies: Suiyuan Technology, Xinhua Technology), commercial aerospace (1 company: Zhongke Yuhang), and robotics (1 company: Yushu Technology). Of these, only Zhongke Yuhang and Suiyuan Technology are unprofitable, with negative net profits. While Yushu Technology’s prospectus shows impressive growth in revenue and net profit, other data in the prospectus appears "counterintuitive" and has been questioned externally. For such hard-tech companies, high investment and high losses are normal. Yet Yushu presents a "low investment, high growth, high profit" picture. The prospectus discloses that Yushu’s humanoid robots have already achieved the world's first shipment volume, with 2025 revenue reaching 1.7 billion yuan, and net profit after deducting non-recurring gains and losses at 600 million yuan, with a net profit margin of 35%. Yushu explains that this is achieved through full-stack self-research and manufacturing, lowering prices, which in turn stimulates sales, leading to such high net profits. However, Yushu’s low R&D investment conflicts with its hard-tech narrative. In the first three quarters of 2025, Yushu’s advertising expenses were only 22.57 million yuan, and the explosive marketing during the Spring Festival Gala in 2025 did not actually cost much. Even more surprising is that Yushu’s R&D personnel and expenses are relatively low. Financial reports show that Yushu currently has 480 employees, with 175 in R&D, accounting for 36.46%, which is not high. The prospectus indicates that by the end of the third quarter of 2025, the company's R&D expenses totaled 90.21 million yuan, accounting for 7.73% of revenue. Compared to peers like UBTECH and Yuejiang, Yushu’s R&D expense ratio is far below the industry average. From 2022 to 2024, Yushu’s total R&D investment was only 150 million yuan. Including the first three quarters of 2025, the total R&D investment over nearly four years is less than 300 million yuan. In comparison, UBTECH alone spent 478 million yuan on R&D in 2024. Yuejiang’s R&D investment was 71.79 million yuan, but its expenses are still higher than Yushu’s. Yushu’s prospectus attempts to show that its robot products can be mass-produced and sold like commodities. But the actual sales uses of its products still raise doubts—whether the explosive growth in robot sales is just a flash in the pan. Since last year, doubts about the commercialization prospects of humanoid robots have persisted. TSMC Chairman Mark Liu even directly criticized robots like Yushu’s: "Jumping around, bouncing, is useless, just good-looking." Yushu disclosed that over 70% of its humanoid robots shipped last year are used in "scientific research and education," supporting its sales figures. Yushu explains that the research and education sector mainly includes universities, research institutions, tech companies, and individual developers for scientific research, technological development, or secondary development. In terms of industry applications, both quadruped and humanoid robots perform poorly in revenue. Especially humanoid robots, whose main industry application is enterprise-guided tours, accounting for 50%–70%, with the rest in intelligent manufacturing, inspection, logistics, etc., which only account for 29.29% of industry applications. 02 CITIC Securities is both sponsor and shareholder Sent 24 people to guide Yushu’s IPO Yushu Technology’s IPO is backed by a host of star investors. Tianyancha shows that Yushu Technology has undergone 10 rounds of financing, with giants like Tencent, China Mobile, Alibaba-affiliated capital, Geely, Xiaomi, Meituan, Variable Capital, Sequoia Capital, Shenzhen Venture Capital, China Mobile Capital, Source Code Capital, and Matrix Partners all holding stakes. In September 2024, CITIC Securities also participated in Yushu’s B+++ round of financing. In February 2024, Jingshi Growth Fund invested in Yushu, and its managing partner is CITIC Securities’ wholly owned subsidiary, Jingshi Investment. This means CITIC Securities is not only the sponsor but also a shareholder of Yushu. When Yushu’s IPO guidance documents were disclosed last year, the signature block at the end, with 24 guiding personnel from CITIC Securities, caused surprise and discussion online, with some jokingly calling it a "joint begging team." Such large guidance teams are common on the STAR Market: Guotai Haitong once assigned 33 people to guide Visionary Technology; CICC and CITIC Construction Investment each sent 18 and 16 people to guide Changxin Technology. Many STAR Market companies qualify under the fifth listing standard, with long business chains, many risk points, and heavy review workloads, so a luxurious team also reflects CITIC Securities’ high regard for this IPO. On March 15, 2024, the CSRC issued revised "Guidelines for On-site Inspection of Issuers," aiming to strengthen this powerful regulatory tool and guide intermediaries to improve their professional quality. The on-site inspections have attracted attention; under strict regulation, intermediaries are also raising their standards and paying more attention to IPO verification. Otherwise, problems could lead to penalties. For both Yushu Technology and CITIC Securities, this inspection is both a test and a "touchstone" to verify the authenticity of financial reports and the quality of professional practice. Do you think Yushu Technology can successfully pass the on-site inspection?
0
0
0
0