【CoinPush】Recently, I came across an interesting discovery. A major bank’s analysis team released a report indicating that the surge in transaction volume and active addresses on Ethereum may look lively, but there are many issues beneath the surface.
Upon closer inspection, the vast majority of new transactions are very small—less than $1. These transactions perfectly fit the pattern of “address poisoning” scams. How do they operate? Scam groups take advantage of Ethereum’s low transaction fees to transfer tiny amounts of tokens to a large number of wallets. These addresses look almost identical to users’ regular wallets, differing by just one or two characters. The goal is clear: to trick users into unknowingly transferring real money to these “fake addresses.”
The data is even more alarming: about 80% of the new active addresses are involved in micro-transfers of stablecoins. In other words, this wave of growth has been largely “polluted” by such malicious activities. In comparison, Bitcoin’s activity has actually declined during the same period, which could explain why ETH’s recent price performance has lagged behind BTC. Institutions have long been aware of this issue; JPMorgan previously expressed doubts about Ethereum’s ability to sustain this kind of growth in a competitive environment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Lonely_Validator
· 9h ago
Damn, 80% are scams? Then this data is just inflated, with no real demand at all.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 9h ago
Is this the same trick again? Is poisoning scams so rampant? 80% of active addresses are polluted, so what are we even talking about on-chain data for?
The recent false prosperity of Ethereum really can't hold up, no wonder interactions lately feel dull.
So, whether the trading volume looks good or not depends on where the money is flowing...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 9h ago
Haha, this is what is commonly called a "false prosperity." It looks like trading is exploding, but in reality, it's all scam groups inflating the data.
This round of ETH manipulation is truly top-notch; 80% of the new addresses are just there to harvest the little guys. I calculated that it's like planting a bunch of weeds in your own vegetable garden and then claiming the soil is full of vitality.
Those micro-transfers are just fishing lines. If you're not careful, you'll click on a "shady address" and send real money away. These scam groups are really taking advantage of Ethereum's cheap transaction fees.
Bitcoin's activity level has actually decreased. Isn't this mocking us ETH holders? Laughing all the way to the loss on this one.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 10h ago
Are 80% all scams? You need to take a good look at this data; it feels like ETH's recent hype is a bit fake.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 10h ago
Damn, 80% are scam poisoning? This wave of ETH "prosperity" is really just false excitement, a fake boom indeed.
These scammers are really outrageous, using low fees as a tool to deceive, anyone who doesn't pay attention to a single character ends up losing, so disgusting.
So the surge in active addresses we see is just scammers spamming, while Bitcoin's activity actually declines, the difference is huge.
Wait, if this data is real, we really need to be cautious, and manage wallet operations more carefully.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 10h ago
Damn, 80% are scams? That's just outrageous. No wonder I feel like Ethereum has been so "lively" lately.
The truth behind the surge in Ethereum transactions: 80% is actually related to address poisoning scams
【CoinPush】Recently, I came across an interesting discovery. A major bank’s analysis team released a report indicating that the surge in transaction volume and active addresses on Ethereum may look lively, but there are many issues beneath the surface.
Upon closer inspection, the vast majority of new transactions are very small—less than $1. These transactions perfectly fit the pattern of “address poisoning” scams. How do they operate? Scam groups take advantage of Ethereum’s low transaction fees to transfer tiny amounts of tokens to a large number of wallets. These addresses look almost identical to users’ regular wallets, differing by just one or two characters. The goal is clear: to trick users into unknowingly transferring real money to these “fake addresses.”
The data is even more alarming: about 80% of the new active addresses are involved in micro-transfers of stablecoins. In other words, this wave of growth has been largely “polluted” by such malicious activities. In comparison, Bitcoin’s activity has actually declined during the same period, which could explain why ETH’s recent price performance has lagged behind BTC. Institutions have long been aware of this issue; JPMorgan previously expressed doubts about Ethereum’s ability to sustain this kind of growth in a competitive environment.