408 Avoiding High-Position Risk Resonance Index First Board Volume and Price Trading Model Unity of Knowledge and Action

Hello everyone: I’m a discipline-mode trader. Trading should follow a mature, well-developed set of pattern systems, then execute with discipline—just achieve unity of knowledge and action.

**Discipline brother focus: **

A proprietary volume-price order-book model trading that exceeds expectations

In the market, you need to learn to catch 《fish》, not have others feed you fish

Discipline brother can’t possibly please everyone

It’s enough to shine and bring warmth to people who are worth the effort

[Taoguba]

Discipline brother focuses on volume-price order-book model trading

Why did Discipline Brother 926 identify Lotus Holdings through the capital-direction volume-price order-book model, so why simulate and share only on 932?

Because the data in that post was far from expectations. Discipline brother also feels there’s no point in sharing. He can’t go out of the way to please all his fan friends—just shine and bring heat for teachers who are worth it. And why can some teachers stay in sync with Discipline brother’s model and get through three consecutive limit-up first boards?

**From the standpoint of capital direction, which ones have one-word big orders: **

Huiyuan Communication: a fiber-optic toolsman

Hangsteel Shares: the biggest “computing power” order

Baihua Biotech, Menovo Pharmaceuticals: in the pre-market, it was already made clear that Tianjin Yao would be at this level. It’s basically viewed as a risk-hedging play; naturally, the pharma gave up. Today the leader strategy’s Tianjin Yao opened up 9%. At the opening, with volume, it had a small goal. All day long it keeps educating you about the leader strategy—today went from -14% intraday. And the index surged—are you uncomfortable?

Changyuan Donggu: after the restructuring resumption, I won’t research it

From the capital perspective, the volume-price order-book model and individual-stock aesthetics

Seven-day model: in the morning, I said Mingpu and Menovo. As for the latter, the pharma—don’t think about it. Mingpu opened up and even gave participation with a premium. Hangsteel’s one-word big-order guidance clearly indicates choosing Mingpu’s computing power. And Huiyuan’s position is also one-word, while Mingpu also has the optical module concept—so it’s naturally the best solution, even if the stock’s share capital is not great and the price is high

Volume-price order-book model:

China National Aviation: don’t know what it’s up for

Oryed: “rui” is a character I’ve never liked

Lotus Holdings: low price, limit-up achieved from the top, performance as a bonus item

Watch the opening to gauge capital’s attitude—half C action. The index was up for a whole day, but Discipline brother clocked out at 9:34

Next: Discipline brother’s Golden 928 must be executed strictly. Only say “see you” when the data matches; if it doesn’t meet expectations, come back after hours to break it down

**Here are two things said together: **

1. About the proprietary model: no matter what kind of fan you are, Discipline brother will not reply to any in-app messages, and as for exchanges—other “golden buns,” you guys know what to do and can go talk with each other

2. In your trading career, don’t go research any indicator. That indicator, and any indicator, all can’t escape volume + price + order book

**3. About the model: basically focused on the first board. First-board differentiation: **

(1) Volume-price order-book “bald head” bullish—like today’s Lotus Holdings
(2) Ultimate pattern first-board: limit-up that blows up—correction the next day
(3) Three-day pattern first-board: 3+2 limit-up, also called “back-into-the-previous-day”
(4) Seven-day pattern first-board: abbreviated as the N-shaped strategy, also called the “limit-up double signature cannon”

Hold at the close:

Lotus Holdings “G”: model opened with 5.5 layers new

East Yue Silicon Materials: doing T significantly reduced the C-position by 0.6 layers

All of the above are simulated accounts

The article and the individual stocks mentioned are all records of my personal simulated judgments of the market, and the refining of logical thinking. The final content is based on my own extensive post-trade reviews and notes. It is shared only as my personal view and record of the market, and does not constitute any investment advice. Do not blindly follow suit and trade. Any buying or selling based on this is your own responsibility for gains and losses