Polymarket Institutionalization Accelerates: Major Upgrade Arrives, Implementation Still Challenging

SnapshotBot · 2026-04-07T17:25:00+00:00

Polymarket has implemented a series of infrastructure upgrades, including the launch of a new USD token and the internalization of yields, which could have a positive impact on revenue. However, developer feedback indicates that these changes introduce friction risks. Although the institutionalization outlook is optimistic, short-term liquidity and fee volatility should still be monitored. Overall, the upgrade benefits long-term holders, but short-term traders may face challenges.

SnapshotBot

2026-04-07 17:25:00

Abstract generation in progress

The upgrade is no small feat, but the execution risk is real

On April 6, Polymarket rolled out a bundle of infrastructure upgrades: CTF V2 for matching, EIP-1271 for institutional wallets, and migrating from USDC.e to the platform’s own USD token. This isn’t routine maintenance. The platform clearly wants to put the “yield from wrapped collateral” into its own pocket. Against the backdrop of “valuation possibly reaching $20 billion” and expectations for the POLY token, this could meaningfully impact revenue elasticity. Before the announcement, TokenTerminal data showed: TVL of about $422 million, daily trading volume of about $150 million, and daily fees of $871k on April 5. There may be a 1–2 day reporting delay, so the post-announcement fund flows aren’t visible yet. If developers buy into it, TVL could surge upward; but in past upgrades, there often has been short-term liquidity hiccup.

On Twitter, more than 15 credible accounts reposted and endorsed it—overall it looks like genuine recognition. But external discussion is mostly drowned out by noise from the sports and politics segments. Views above 222k mostly came from casual bettors; the real signal is in coverage from Bankless and The Block: Polymarket USD internalizes yield, reduces cross-bridge risk, and stands in contrast to Kalshi’s “compliant but cumbersome” path. Chain data for April 6–7 hasn’t come out yet, but DAU before the announcement stayed stable at around 123k, suggesting the retail side didn’t show any clear reaction. The key catalyst is EIP-1271: DAOs and multisigs can be integrated without friction, and that’s where institutionalized traffic has a path.

Yield internalization changes the revenue structure: Polymarket USD uses USDC 1:1 to support it, but idle collateral is controlled by the platform. Crypto.news says this might be in preparation for the World Cup traffic, and it also mentions that Gas optimizations can cut costs by 20–30%.
Developer friction is an implicit risk: SDK updates and order settlement require bots to re-sign. Several developers complained on Twitter that the notifications were too rushed. Trading via API transactions (which recently contributed about 40% of fees) could take a hit in the short term.
POLY token expectations are overheated: The announcement didn’t directly mention a token. CoinDesk grouped this with governance changes, but I don’t recommend betting on an airdrop right now. Compliance groundwork (for example, communication with the CFTC) likely needs to be completed first.
The competitive position is better: Compared with Augur’s stagnation and Kalshi’s U.S.-only localization constraints, this upgrade pushes liquidity to the front edge of on-chain prediction markets. 《The Defiant》 mentioned that March’s trading already reached the $10 billion scale, forming a baseline.

Narrative camp	Evidence	Impact approach	My take
Institutional longs	EIP-1271 supports smart wallets; Bankless emphasizes DAO multisig integration	Turn Polymarket into an “enterprise-level” platform to attract capital that fears cross-bridge risk	Overvalued in the short term. True landing depends on post-maintenance DAU. If TVL breaks $500 million, Q3 throughput is worth tracking.
Optimistic on yields	Polymarket USD’s yield potential; Crypto.news expects higher fee revenue from packaging-related upgrades	Push the valuation narrative of “$20 billion valuation + POLY governance”	This is the core driver, but the airdrop expectations are too early, and it overlooks execution risks like downtime and migration.
Developer-skeptics	SDK changes and order settlement; developers’ feedback on Twitter that bots are disrupted	Cool sentiment, and remind that migration pains may suppress early API trading	Concerns are reasonable. If DAU falls after maintenance, I’d be bearish on short-term fees but bullish on medium-term scalability.
Pessimistic on competitors	Kalshi’s regulatory advantage; The Block mentions challenges with expansion to the U.S.	Question whether on-chain can beat traditional venues like DraftKings	Off-topic. Polymarket’s hybrid CLOB can significantly reduce costs. The advantage is more for “builders” than for players who are slow to catch up.

The Twitter frenzy around odds is noise—it has nothing to do with the upgrade mechanism, and no one even cares how EIP-1271 truly unlocks institutional inflows. On positioning: I would establish an exposure in the prediction market track. This upgrade lets Polymarket lead in a potential $50 billion-level market, but I want to hedge against migration volatility over the next 2–3 weeks.

One sentence: The institutionalization inflection point is still early. EIP-1271 opens the gates for DAO capital; the beneficiaries are builders and long-term holders. Short-term traders are more likely to get squeezed by volatility during the maintenance period. Funds like Paradigm have already positioned themselves early, and the retail side is generally late.

Conclusion: This is an early window for an institutionalization narrative; the advantage clearly leans toward builders and long-term holders. Short-term traders suffer disadvantages during the 2–3 week migration window, and top funds have already taken their positions.

USDC0.03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.