Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Why do securities firms now need to emphasize fund advisory services?
(From: Quan Yan She)
— A inevitable choice to move from channel competition to wealth management
If we simply divide the development of China’s securities industry over the past 20 years, it can be broken into three stages:
Channel era → Capital intermediary era → Wealth management era.
In the past, brokerages relied on “channel dividends”—commission income, the spread from margin financing and securities lending (two financing), and investment banking business. The core characteristics of this model were:
Income is highly dependent on market conditions
Weak customer relationships, low stickiness
Single, undiversified profit structure
But with the following key changes, the traditional model is accelerating toward failure:
Internet brokerages, price wars, and regulatory pressure pushing for transparency have compressed trading commissions to extremely low levels.
The activity level of retail investors is highly cyclical: when sentiment is strong, revenue surges; when sentiment is weak, revenue drops quickly.
Long-term capital such as public funds, insurance, and pension funds is gaining a higher share, while the marginal influence of retail investors declines.
Shifting from “encouraging trading” to “encouraging long-term investing and value investing.”
The conclusion is very clear:
👉 Brokerages that rely solely on trading will be unsustainable in the future.
Many people mistakenly think that fund investment advisory is just “helping clients pick funds,” which severely underestimates this business.
The essence of fund investment advisory is:
👉 A client-centered asset allocation service system.
Its core capabilities include:
It’s not about selecting a single fund, but building a portfolio (equities + fixed income + alternative assets).
Control drawdowns and volatility so clients can “hold on.”
Help clients overcome the human weakness of “chasing rallies and selling at lows.”
Through ongoing communication, enhance clients’ trust and retention.
In other words:
👉 Fund investment advisory solves the problem of “clients not being able to make money,” not whether there are good funds.
(I) The policy dividend window has opened
In recent years, regulators have clearly supported pilot programs for fund investment advisory and gradually made them routine. The logic behind it is very clear:
Increase residents’ property-related income
Promote long-term capital market participation
Change the “short-term speculation” culture
Fund investment advisory is becoming one of the important foundational infrastructures of the financial system.
👉 Whoever builds capabilities first will occupy the commanding heights of future competition.
(II) Major changes in residents’ wealth structure
Chinese residents’ assets are undergoing a profound transformation:
In the past:
Real estate dominated
Bank deposits were the mainstay
Now:
Real estate returns are declining
Interest rates are falling
Residents begin to look for alternative investment channels
The continued growth of public fund scale is the most direct reflection.
But the problem is:
👉 Residents “know how to buy funds,” but they don’t “know how to hold funds.”
This is exactly where the value of fund investment advisory lies.
(III) Customer demand shifts from “products” to “services”
In the past, customers asked:
👉 “Do you have any good stocks?”
👉 “Which fund has been performing well?”
Now customers care more about:
👉 “How should I allocate my assets?”
👉 “How can I earn steadily?”
👉 “How do I avoid large losses?”
This means:
Demand has shifted from trading tools → wealth solutions.
And fund investment advisory is the core vehicle that carries this demand.
(IV) The key lever for brokerages to transform into wealth management
All brokerages are calling for “wealth management transformation,” but the question is:
👉 What is the key lever?
The answer is fund investment advisory.
Because it has several key features:
Compared with private placements and personalized services, advisory portfolios are easier to scale.
They can directly connect with mature product systems.
Suitable for online and intelligent operations.
Gradually reduce reliance on commissions.
(I) Reconstruct the income structure: from trading income to management fee income
Traditional brokerage income structure:
Brokerage business (trading commissions)
Margin financing interest
Investment banking business
The problem:
👉 Strong cyclicality and large volatility
Changes brought by advisory business:
Ongoing management fee income
Growth in client assets under management (AUM) drives returns
Improved income stability
👉 From “living by the weather” to “living by one’s assets.”
(II) Increase client stickiness: from low-frequency relationships to long-term relationships
Traditional model:
Clients trade only a few times per year
Almost no ongoing interaction
Advisory model:
Continuously track portfolio performance
Regular communication
Long-term companionship
The result is:
👉 Client churn rates decline significantly
👉 Asset retention rates increase substantially
(III) Open the entry point to high-net-worth clients
The core needs of high-net-worth clients:
Asset allocation
Risk control
Long-term planning
Advisory business is the “ticket” to enter the high-net-worth market.
Once trust is established, it can be further extended to:
Private placement products
Family offices
Comprehensive financial services
(IV) Build differentiated competitive capability
Against the backdrop of commission rates converging, the differences among brokerages are becoming smaller.
But advisory capabilities differ:
Research and investment capability
Portfolio construction capability
Client service capability
👉 These are all barriers formed through long-term accumulation.
Future competition is essentially:
“Who understands clients better” + “Who can help clients make money.”
If brokerages truly want to do advisory well, they need to build four major systems.
(I) Research and investment system: the foundation of capability
Includes:
Macroeconomic research
Asset allocation models
Fund selection system
Risk control framework
The key is not predicting the market, but:
👉 building stable, replicable portfolio strategies.
(II) Product system: portfolios instead of single products
The traditional sales logic is:
👉 Recommend one fund
The advisory logic is:
👉 Provide “portfolio solutions”
For example:
Conservative portfolios
Balanced portfolios
Aggressive portfolios
Meet different risk preferences.
(III) Client operations system: the core competitive strength
Includes:
Client segmentation (asset size, risk preferences)
Refined operations (content, services, companionship)
Behavioral guidance (avoid frequent subscriptions and redemptions)
👉 The outcome of advisory business, to a large extent, depends on “operations.”
(IV) Technology system: key to scale
Advisory must rely on technology to enable:
Robo-advisor (intelligent investment advisory)
Data analysis
Automatic rebalancing
Client profiling
Otherwise it cannot be scaled and replicated.
Although the outlook is promising, many issues still exist in reality:
(I) Insufficient client education
Many investors still remain at:
Chasing hot themes
Looking at short-term returns
Whereas advisory emphasizes long-term and stable performance.
👉 The cognition gap needs time to be bridged.
(II) Uneven advisory capabilities
Some institutions:
Still focus on sales orientation
Lack true asset allocation capability
Leading to poor client experience.
(III) Fee models are not yet mature
Clients’ acceptance of “paid advisory” is still being cultivated.
But this is an inevitable trend:
👉 In the future, it will definitely shift from “making money by selling products” to “earning from service fees.”
(IV) Impact from short-term market volatility
When the market falls sharply:
Client trust can easily waver
The advisory system faces tests
Truly excellent advisors need to get through market cycles.
(I) Full-scale online transformation
APP becomes the main battlefield
Content drives growth
Robo-advisor becomes widespread
(II) Advisory + content ecosystem
In the future, it won’t be just allocation. It will be:
👉 Content + services + community
Strengthen trust through continuous content output.
(III) Evolve from fund investment advisory to full-asset investment advisory
In the future, it will expand to:
ETF allocation
Global assets
Alternative investments
Form a true “family asset management platform.”
Fund investment advisory is not a simple new business; it is:
👉 A fundamental shift in the commercial model of the securities industry.
In one sentence:
Who can do it:
Client-centered
Provide a long-term, stable return experience
Build deep trust relationships
Will win in the competition over the next 10 years.
If we look from the perspective of someone with 20 years of industry experience, the importance of this round of change is no less than the earlier transformation from the branch-office era to internet brokerages.
But this time is deeper, because it does not only change the channel—it changes:
👉 the entire industry’s way of creating value.