Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
So, we’ve reached 2026, and everyone wants to know: did the Benner Cycle really work? A few months ago, it was everywhere in the crypto community—this old chart from more than 150 years ago predicting that this would be the year of the big market peak. But reality is turning out to be very different from what many expected.
For those who don’t know, the Benner Cycle was born back in 1875, when a farmer named Samuel Benner lost everything in the 1873 crisis and decided to study patterns in agricultural prices. He noticed that solar cycles affected the harvests, which in turn moved prices. From there, he created a chart dividing the years into three categories: panic, boom, and recession. And the most interesting thing is that this cycle somehow got big events right, like the Great Depression, the dot-com bubble, and even the COVID crash.
The thing is, last year, when the crypto market was recovering, several investors started using the Benner Cycle as a basis for super optimistic scenarios. The prophecy pointed to 2026 as the market top, the best time to sell. A lot of people bought into this narrative because, well, we want to believe in something, don’t we?
Then came the shock: in April of last year, Trump announced that controversial tariff plan, and the markets went haywire. Crypto fell from 2.64 trillion to 2.32 trillion in days. Since then, JPMorgan has raised the probability of a global recession to 60%, and Goldman Sachs has also increased its recession forecasts. Veteran traders like Peter Brandt started questioning whether we weren’t just being distracted by old charts instead of dealing with market reality.
But here’s the interesting point: even with all this pressure, some investors still believe in the Benner Cycle. And it’s not because it’s magic—it’s because a lot of people believe it. Markets are made of numbers, yes, but also of psychology, narratives, and collective momentum.
Google Trends showed that searches for the Benner Cycle exploded when economic uncertainty increased. This reveals something real about how retail investors look for comforting narratives during times of instability. The question that remains is: will the Benner Cycle validate itself by the end of the year, or will we see yet another distraction that doesn’t pan out?