A leading compliant platform establishes a Quantum Security Committee: The post-quantum cryptography era is here

LiquiditySurfer · 2026-01-22T14:00:16+00:00

A compliant platform has established an independent advisory committee on quantum computing and blockchain, aimed at addressing the threats of quantum computing to the blockchain ecosystem. The committee, composed of top experts, is responsible for assessing the impact of quantum computing on blockchain, providing defense recommendations, and promoting post-quantum security development. A detailed roadmap on quantum risk assessment is expected to be released.

LiquiditySurfer

2026-01-22 14:00:16

Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】 Recently, there has been a noteworthy development— a leading compliant platform announced the establishment of an independent advisory committee on quantum computing and blockchain, with a very straightforward purpose: to proactively address the potential threats of quantum computing to the blockchain ecosystem.

The committee brings together top experts in quantum information, blockchain cryptography, distributed systems, and other related fields, including the director of the Quantum Information Center at the University of Texas at Austin, the co-director of the Blockchain Research Center at Stanford University, and researchers from the Ethereum Foundation, among other prominent members. This lineup underscores the seriousness of the issue.

What is the main task of the committee? On one hand, to assess the impact of quantum computing on existing blockchain systems; on the other hand, to provide clear, actionable defense recommendations for the broader developer community and institutions. Specific tasks include publishing position papers on quantum risks, providing real-time technical analysis, and rapidly responding to breakthrough developments.

On the technical front, this platform has already advanced post-quantum security in multiple directions: updating Bitcoin address handling methods, upgrading internal key management systems, and integrating post-quantum signature schemes like ML-DSA into multi-party computation (MPC) systems. A detailed roadmap for quantum risk assessment and resilience building is expected to be released early next year.

In simple terms, this is a proactive move before the actual arrival of quantum threats. For practitioners, understanding these defense strategies and keeping up with technological developments are essential lessons.

ETH-1.94%

BTC-0.65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 8h ago

honestly this is just governance theater unless they actually publish actionable specs. vitalik's already warned about this back in '21 tbh. the real question is—will developers *actually* implement the recommendations or just cite the paper and move on 🤓

Reply0

HashRateHermit

· 8h ago

Quantum threats are really here; I had a premonition that this day would come. But this lineup is indeed luxurious—Texas + Stanford + Ethereum Foundation. They're serious. The post-quantum cryptography era... Are our private keys still safe? Haha. The key is to see what this committee can actually implement; don’t let it be just empty talk. The cryptography arms race is heating up; it feels like we need to act quickly. This is still early for retail investors, but institutions are already taking precautions. Thinking back to those quantum computing papers before, now someone is finally responding. Regulatory platforms doing this show that the issue is really coming to the forefront. Let's wait and see their defense suggestions; they might change some things. If the day of quantum computing truly arrives, how many private keys will need to be reset... If this committee isn’t just talk, there should be some real substance. Is the post-quantum era still far away? It doesn’t seem as near as I imagined. It feels like they are paving the way for the future, not just alarmist talk.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 8h ago

Quantum threats should have been taken seriously a long time ago. Diagnostic records show that many protocol code vulnerabilities are actually the original sins of key generation. However, with so many top experts organizing to write stance documents, this lineup does have some substance, but regular reviews and updates are necessary. --- Another "we value this" committee, but the key is to see what gradual treatment plans they come up with next; just releasing documents isn't enough. --- Texas + Stanford + Ethereum—this configuration looks impressive, but what's the probability of it actually becoming a standardized defense solution? I'm keeping a wait-and-see attitude. --- Quantum computing threats are no longer a new topic. The problem is, is it already a bit late now that a committee is just being formed? --- Basically, it's a health assessment report before patching. But it's definitely better than doing nothing. It’s recommended that this committee's outputs be implemented quickly, and not just remain on paper.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 8h ago

Speaking of this quantum risk issue, it should have been taken seriously long ago, but it's not too late to act now. Post-quantum cryptography definitely needs someone to oversee it; otherwise, if quantum breakthroughs happen one day, our private keys will be compromised. The lineup from Austin, Texas, Stanford—this time they're serious. Just looking at the personnel setup shows it's not just for show. The threat of quantum computing to blockchain has been discussed for a while, and finally a leading platform has stepped up to organize an expert committee. Honestly, this kind of forward-looking strategy is much more reliable than firefighting after the fact. Thumbs up. People in the cryptography field are very nervous. I think this time they're really going all out. But whether the defensive suggestions can truly be implemented across major blockchains is the key—just releasing documents isn't enough. The arrival of the quantum era might be faster than we imagine, so we need to prepare in advance. It would be great if this committee could provide practical technical solutions to the developer community—no more empty talk. Finally, someone is taking proactive action, so we won't be passively attacked later.

View OriginalReply0

not_your_keys

· 8h ago

Quantum cryptography is really about to move up the agenda; we can't delay any longer. --- It's the same routine again—establish a committee, invite experts, release a white paper... As long as it can be implemented, that's good enough. --- The University of Texas, Stanford, and the Ethereum Foundation—this lineup is indeed impressive, but I still want to see the specific plan. --- Is the post-quantum era here? Feels like we've been saying that for years... Can we really make some progress this time? --- Now everyone is scrambling to respond to the quantum threat; it all depends on who can break through first. --- The problem is most projects haven't made any moves; only leading platforms are concerned, which is a bit ironic. --- Quantum computing threats should have been taken seriously long ago, but they've been suppressed by the hype around shitcoins. --- Wow, we need to upgrade cryptography before quantum computers truly break through, or there's no hope. --- Brothers, keep it up, don't let my private keys be opened by quantum computers. --- If this really gets done, it could change the entire ecosystem's security landscape, but I bet five bucks it will still take a long time.

View OriginalReply0