U.S. Congress Drafts New Stablecoin Regulations: Policy Clash Between Exchange Lobbying and Bank Competition

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】The battle between crypto exchanges and traditional banks for funds has escalated to the U.S. Congress. A CEO of a compliant platform recently held a key lobbying meeting on Capitol Hill with several lawmakers, focusing on the future direction of stablecoin reward policies.

His stance is very clear: banking lobbying groups are attempting to use legislation to completely restrict stablecoin reward mechanisms. This move would directly weaken the competitiveness of the crypto industry in attracting user funds against traditional banks. But on the other hand, why can’t Americans earn higher returns through digital assets? The banks oppose this, simply because they are afraid they will be forced to raise deposit interest rates to compete.

The details of the policy push are even more interesting. Previously, a draft of the Digital Asset Market Structure Act sparked strong opposition from exchanges, ultimately leading the Senate committee chair to announce a pause on the bill’s review. The draft included a compromise: banning deposit yield payments but allowing other incentives like trading rewards.

Currently, the situation is that senators plan to vote on an amendment that would fully ban stablecoin rewards, but the outcome of the vote remains uncertain. This means the final stance on stablecoin policy is still up for negotiation.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DAOplomacyvip
· 5h ago
ngl the whole "stablecoin yields" thing is just regulatory theatre at this point... banks scared of losing deposit flows, exchanges playing 4d chess in senate hallways. same old story, different actors. path dependency is real here — whoever sets the incentive structure first basically wins the entire game. historically precedent suggests these blanket bans never stick anyway lol
Reply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 5h ago
Here we go again with this? Banks are just afraid we make money.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalkvip
· 5h ago
Here they go again. Those guys at the bank are really getting anxious, fearing that stablecoins will take away their cheese.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fcvip
· 5h ago
Restricting stablecoin rewards again? The banks are really getting desperate, afraid that we will make money.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfessionvip
· 5h ago
Another political game? Banks are firmly blocking stablecoins. Frankly, they're just afraid of losing their jobs.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoiavip
· 5h ago
The banks are really panicking now, haha. The impact of internet finance has arrived.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 5h ago
The bank folks are getting anxious, this is really interesting now. Ban stablecoin rewards? What’s the deal, afraid that our crypto will take away their livelihood?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)