Payment systems demand one thing above all: predictability. Stable fees, consistent settlement times, and execution that doesn't crumble under volume spikes. Here's the thing—most blockchain infrastructure treats payments as an afterthought. StableChain approaches it differently, embedding payment-native architecture directly into the base layer. Recent analysis breaks down why stablecoins need dedicated infrastructure designed for settlement, not retrofit solutions. When you're moving value at scale, deterministic execution isn't optional.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BitcoinDaddyvip
· 4h ago
Someone finally said it: on-chain payments are really terrible, with delays and costs that are unbearably high.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 4h ago
Honestly, the on-chain payment space is still a mess... Retrofit solutions are all garbage.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 5h ago
To be honest, it's another narrative of "this time is different." The grassroots embedded payment infrastructure... I've heard this too many times. Everyone claims to have solved predictability, but what happens? Once the incentive mechanism becomes complex, it starts to distort, and at that point, costs will still spiral out of control.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfitvip
· 5h ago
Haha, here we go again with the band-aid solution story, but the perspective of StableChain is really interesting.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)