Looking at the on-chain data of a certain project, it is indeed worth being cautious. The daily trading volume hovers around $400,000, which is difficult to sustain for a project that has been online for half a year. A careful observation of the candlestick charts reveals that, apart from occasional rapid spikes, there are hardly any decent rebounds, and the overall trend appears to be suppressed.



What is even more worth paying attention to is the performance before and after the unlocking period — during that time, a large amount of public opinion emerged, and there were also significant changes in the project's holdings at the organizational level. The coincidence of these timing points, combined with abnormal trading characteristics at the mechanism level, reflects potential issues in the project's operation.

Insufficient trading depth, suspicious liquidity, and concentrated operations at key time points are all signals that need to be closely monitored when evaluating a project. When trading, it’s better to focus on data and less on stories.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GraphGuruvip
· 3h ago
It's the same sneaky tactic of cutting leeks behind the scenes, with the data clearly laid out. The wave of unlocking operations was practically textbook-level coordination; luckily someone exposed it. A daily trading volume of 400,000 yen and still dare to call it a project? I feel embarrassed for the operators.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 3h ago
400,000 trading volume in half a year and still this level, honestly just don't touch it --- Together before and after the unlock? I've seen this trick too many times --- Still dare to buy with such poor liquidity? Serves you right for getting cut --- Data doesn't lie, even with candlesticks pressed into paper, are people still buying? --- It's the same old routine of public opinion coordinated with position changes, so boring --- Don't tell me stories, just look at the data, this project’s data is a mess --- The lack of trading depth alone is enough to pass, nothing to discuss --- There are hardly any stop-loss placements, basically eaten alive by the whales --- Concentrated abnormal operations at the same time point, clearly suspicious --- Only this trading volume in half a year? Should have been alert long ago --- That phrase "stop listening to stories" hit me, too many people only listen to slogans and don't watch the market
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMinervip
· 3h ago
400,000 yen in transactions? I'm really laughing. This number can't be fabricated at all. I had already been tracking the position changes during the unlock wave, and the transfer trajectories of those early addresses are clear at a glance. This is just the prelude to a dump.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoyvip
· 3h ago
400,000 JPY trading volume is really outrageous. After half a year, it still behaves this way—what does that say? The concentration of operations during the unlock was indeed a bit off-putting. Data speaks for itself; don't be fooled by stories. The candlestick chart is just held down like that, with no decent rebounds. Liquidity needs to be watched carefully, or you'll get cut so quickly. I've seen many projects like this; the套路 (套路) is all the same.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 3h ago
A trading volume of 400,000 JPY has shown no improvement after half a year, which is a clear red flag. Big moves happening around the unlock period are a common tactic I’ve seen many times. As long as you're not foolish, you can see the tricks behind it. Honestly, I would just pass on projects with such poor liquidity; it's not worth the gamble.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 3h ago
400,000 daily trading volume? After half a year, it's still like this, there must be some issues. The operation during the unlock period was too deliberate, the timing was perfectly controlled, you can tell at a glance that they are guilty. Liquidity, when all is said and done, is just the market maker manipulating the price; don't be fooled by the K-line. Data speaks for itself; stories are just used to trap people. I usually just pass on projects like this; there's no need to gamble. --- Another coin being suppressed and unable to break free; the depth of trading that can't escape really shows the problem. --- Holding positions during the unlock period? Haha, that tactic is so old-fashioned. --- Honestly, understanding on-chain data is more reliable than listening to any analysis. --- A daily trading volume of only 400,000 and still daring to go live—where does this confidence come from? --- Suspicious liquidity is enough reason to run; there's no need to wait to be trapped. --- Key timing for concentrated operations is indeed a big signal; the market maker's tricks are always the same.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)