Many people talk about blockchain privacy, often equating it with "escaping regulation." But a closer look at traditional finance reveals that privacy is not inherently anti-compliance; rather, it is an essential part of a compliant system. Have you ever seen a bank display customer balances in the lobby? Do fund companies post every transaction detail online? Certainly not. These pieces of information must be protected; once exposed, issues like market manipulation and business leaks will follow.



This logic also applies to blockchain. If blockchain is to handle real financial transaction volumes, it must solve the same problems. There's a project called Dusk Network that has developed an approach called "Auditable Privacy," using zero-knowledge proofs to enable the network to verify that transactions comply with all rules without revealing the specific details. This allows blockchain for the first time to achieve a balance similar to traditional finance: protecting privacy while maintaining trustworthiness.

This is especially critical in the RWA (Real-World Assets) field. Imagine an asset management company issuing $1 billion in fund shares on-chain. If all subscription and redemption records are fully transparent, risk management and strategy execution become impossible. But on such privacy networks, this data is only visible to involved parties and regulators; others cannot see it.

Future regulation will only become stricter, so blockchain cannot remain in a "fully transparent" stage. Instead, it will evolve into a "graded visibility" model—different roles see different levels of information. This infrastructure is gradually being built. In such a network, the value of privacy coins or privacy network tokens is rooted in this structural demand: they are the fuel for on-chain financial operations and an essential component of the future decentralized Wall Street.
DUSK-15.36%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockchainiacvip
· 6h ago
This logic indeed has no flaws. Without privacy in RWA, there's really no way to play. --- Zero-knowledge proofs should have been popularized long ago. Auditable privacy is the right path. --- Banks operate this way. Why do people criticize privacy coins on the chain? Double standards are too outrageous. --- I believe in the Dusk approach. Tiered visibility is much more reliable than complete transparency. --- Regulators will eventually force on-chain finance to adopt privacy solutions. Instead of being passive, it's better to follow now. --- A billion-dollar fund is transparent? Ha, the fund manager's strategies are instantly copied. --- Compliance and privacy are originally a pair. Unfortunately, some still can't tell the difference. --- This is the future. Decentralized Wall Street indeed needs this infrastructure. --- RWA without privacy protection is a joke. The article's idea is good. --- The larger the market, the more privacy is needed. This demand truly exists.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAllvip
· 6h ago
Oh finally someone has explained this thoroughly, privacy ≠ money laundering, I love this point of view Auditable privacy is indeed a concept, but can Dusk really be implemented? It still feels like a conceptual stage RWA needs to be on-chain at scale, and the tiered visibility system should have been in place long ago, otherwise institutions will be at a loss That's right, the future will be like this, but I bet the process will be super long... I agree with the value proposition of privacy networks, it all depends on who can truly achieve the same experience as a bank I feel the next narrative shift might be here, tired of the all-transparent stories before
View OriginalReply0
EternalMinervip
· 6h ago
This logic indeed broke my previous stereotypes: privacy ≠ escaping regulation --- Dusk's zero-knowledge proof approach is really something; the direction of auditable privacy is correct --- If RWA really wants to scale, without a privacy layer, it’s impossible to operate; I agree with this judgment --- The evolution towards tiered visibility feels irreversible; blockchain will inevitably move in this direction --- So, is the token logic of privacy networks just infrastructure premium? That perspective is a bit fresh --- Bringing over traditional financial privacy protections is indeed convincing; finally someone explained this clearly --- A $1 billion fund transparently on-chain? That would indeed be a disaster; this example is very vivid --- Future on-chain finance will have to be like this: a balance of privacy + auditability is the way to go --- Feeling like privacy coins are about to turn around? In the long run, this demand is truly essential
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuthvip
· 6h ago
Damn, this is truly insightful analysis. Finally, someone has clarified the relationship between privacy and regulation. --- Dusk's approach is indeed brilliant; the use of zero-knowledge proofs is exceptional. --- For RWA to truly take off, privacy is indeed a hard requirement; otherwise, institutions simply can't participate. --- The direction of tiered visibility is on the right track; otherwise, how could traditional finance go on-chain? --- The key is whether regulatory agencies will buy in. That's the real test for Dusk. --- I've said it before, a fully transparent system is simply not suitable for finance. Finally, someone sees through this. --- The narrative of privacy networks has finally gained rational support after being demonized for so long. --- Wait, in that case, can privacy coins still be banned? What if regulators truly endorse privacy protection? --- If Dusk can really pull this off, it could be a good opportunity, but it still depends on execution. --- It sounds good in theory, but whether regulators will accept privacy networks depends on whether major institutions start using them.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctorvip
· 6h ago
It seems logically consistent, but we need to see how Dusk Network's zero-knowledge proof performs in practice... It's easy to say "auditability," but whether it can truly be implemented effectively depends on details like liquidity metrics and verification latency.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt