U.S. Pentagon Launches Grok Military Application: 3 Million Soldiers Use AI, Risks and Opportunities Coexist

2026-01-13 09:58:13

【CryptoPush】U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth recently announced a major development: plans to fully integrate the xAI-developed Grok system into the Pentagon by the end of this month. The scale is significant—covering approximately 3 million military and civilian personnel.

How exactly will this be implemented? The system will run on the GenAI.mil platform, deployed alongside Google’s Gemini, both with the highest security level (Impact Level 5). Interestingly, Grok will fetch data from the X platform in real-time to provide dynamic intelligence for military operations and strategic planning.

Hegseth’s logic is straightforward: this can create a decisive advantage. He sees it as a key step to accelerate the application of AI in the defense system and to break free from various restrictions.

But here’s the issue. Critics argue that the risks are considerable—system errors, algorithmic bias, Elon Musk’s potential influence on defense decisions… These are all concerns on the table. Some are questioning whether it’s reliable to let a private company’s AI system directly participate in military decision-making.

In summary, this development not only demonstrates the potential of AI in national defense but also exposes governance and ethical challenges.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MultiSigFailMaster

· 15h ago

Damn, Elon Musk's Grok directly entering the Pentagon? Is this real? 3 million soldiers are using AI to eat? --- Wait, real-time data scraping X for military decision-making? That logic is so absurd... --- It's Elon Musk again and the military, this combo is a bit shaky, the risks are obvious. --- Is Grok really reliable as an intelligence source? I have my doubts. --- The Pentagon is so short of talent right now, they even have to move Grok up there? Algorithm bias needs to be closely monitored. --- Wow, AI making military decisions, just thinking about it gives me chills haha. --- Elon Musk getting involved with defense systems is truly eye-opening, who gave him that courage? --- Full security level, but the data source is Twitter, this logic doesn't quite add up.

View OriginalReply0

RektButSmiling

· 01-15 09:53

Grok connected to the Pentagon? Is Musk trying to turn Twitter data into military intelligence? That's incredible. This risk is indeed at its maximum... When a system bug occurs, the entire army is confused? But honestly, Google Gemini is in, so why can't Grok? They're all AI casinos anyway. 30 million soldiers using this thing, what if problems arise later... Does Musk have such a strong desire for power...

View OriginalReply0

BuyTheTop

· 01-13 10:28

Damn, 3 million soldiers using Grok? Elon Musk is about to get directly involved in national defense decisions... I really don't think feeding Twitter real-time data into military systems is a good idea. What if they get manipulated? This logic is just ridiculous. Can a social media crawler really do military intelligence? The information quality is questionable. Algorithm bias is indeed a serious issue. AI making decisions is basically gambling, especially at the level of 3 million people... Wait, isn't this exposing the entire decision-making chain to a private owner? Something feels off.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 01-13 10:28

Damn, Grok is directly military-grade? 30 million people using Musk's AI for war decisions, how crazy is that? --- X platform data feeds real-time military intelligence... Hmm, this logic is a bit extreme. --- The key is whether Grok's algorithm is reliable; what if it becomes biased? --- Basically, Musk installed a backdoor at the Pentagon. --- Wait, Gemini is also running on it. Is this competition or complementarity? --- If the impact level is 5, can we rest assured? I don't believe it. --- The Web3 circle is about to be eaten by the military-industrial complex again, a bit annoying. --- Decisive advantage... sounds like an excuse to raise more funding for the military. --- The real question: who is responsible when Grok makes a mistake? --- The trend of AI militarization is inevitable, sooner or later, but the speed is indeed outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 01-13 10:28

Elon Musk's move is really daring, directly pushing Grok into the Pentagon... 3 million soldiers using this thing, just thinking about it is a bit terrifying --- Wait, real-time X data for military decision-making? Isn't this turning Musk's recommendation algorithm into national defense intelligence? --- Laughing to death, even algorithmic bias dares to be classified at the highest security level, this is true systemic risk --- Now Web3 and the military-industrial complex are about to form an alliance. Will there be military NFTs tomorrow? Haha --- Grok's appetite for data is so big, if it really gets full-scale X platform intelligence... privacy might really become an antique --- No, no, I need to see if this thing will crash, betting a Dogecoin, it will eventually cause trouble --- Americans: We prioritize AI. In other words, prioritize making Elon Musk money --- Suddenly I understand why some say crypto is as money-burning as national defense, both are confidence games

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizeMe

· 01-13 09:58

Grok connected to the Pentagon? Isn't this just a disguised operation where Musk directly participates in military decision-making? Algorithm bias could directly impact strategic judgments, it's terrifying. 30 million people using the same AI system, the risk of single point failure is extremely high. Real-time data collection for military intelligence... a new approach in information warfare? Does the Pentagon really trust Musk's black-box algorithms to make decisions involving national security? Who designed this plan? It feels like no one has considered the consequences.

View OriginalReply0