Deflation Comparison: Who is Stronger, JST or UNI? Image Breakdown

Recently, both JST and UNI have launched their token repurchase and destruction mechanisms, each building a closed loop for capturing token value. From the perspective of execution strength and short-term market performance, JST's actions are particularly prominent.

1. Buyback and Burn Mechanism

JST (JustLend DAO)
1 / Buyback and burn using protocol net income + USDD multi-chain ecosystem profits
2 / The first batch has destroyed approximately 18 million USD, accounting for nearly 20% of the total supply.
3 / The remaining portion will continue to be burned over the next four quarters and will be included in the new net income.
4 / Fully follow the DAO governance process, with on-chain verifiable hashes and high transparency.
5 / Use the real net income + the locked 59 million USDT for deflation

UNI (Uniswap)
1 / After the proposal is passed, the protocol fees, L2 Sequencer charges, PFDA, aggregator Hooks, and other revenues will be used for burn.
2 / A one-time retrospective destruction of 100 million UNI, accounting for approximately 16% of the circulation.
3 / Directly reduce LP earnings, which may affect liquidity
4 / Historically, attempts to switch rates have been unsuccessful multiple times, making progress difficult.
5 / There may be securities/tax risks legally

The destruction path of JST is more direct and has been implemented, while the mechanism of UNI covers multiple sources of income, has great potential, but still requires governance and market validation for short-term implementation.

2. Market Performance
•JST increased by 16.74% over the past year.
•UNI decreased by 5.71% over the year

In the short term, the buyback and burn of JST provides clear support for market scarcity while establishing a positive closed loop.

3. Ecological Foundation and Sustainability

JST / JustLend DAO, five years without security incidents, the protocol is safe and reliable, with high yield support (USDD deposits can reach 6%-12% APY), TRON energy rental income is stable, providing a sustainable source of funds for buybacks and burns.

UNI / Uniswap, a mainstream DEX on Ethereum, has a large trading volume and a broad user base, with significant potential for ecological revenue and a multi-dimensional design for long-term value capture.

Four, to conclude, a few words.
1 / JST: Strong burn intensity, transparent path, clear short-term market signals, solid ecological foundation.
2 / UNI: The potential of the burn mechanism is great, but its implementation requires governance and regulatory validation.

In comparison, JST stands out in terms of execution strength and market visibility, while both enhance token value through a deflationary mechanism.

The epic buyback and burn of JST shows that deflation not only enhances the scarcity of the token but also strengthens community confidence, laying the foundation for long-term value in the future.

@justinsuntron @DeFi_JUST #TRONEcoStar