Imagine a 220-carat emerald necklace—



In 1950, the Maharani of Baroda in India commissioned such a piece of jewelry.

It's not just about flaunting wealth; it's more about the "weight" of history and craftsmanship. What do you think: is tangible rarity more valuable, or are digital collectibles worth more? 💎🤔
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropNinjavip
· 3h ago
The tangible ones are relatively reliable.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)