Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Did you ever voting on a proposal of projects you love? You might know #Tally probably, sadly they are shutting down. The one left now only #Snapshot.
Not surprised, #DAOs was never a interesting narrative for retails.
There are 13k+ DAOs over crypto, but average participation just ~17%. Most “governance” is decided by a tiny slice of holders while the rest don’t care.
Top 0.1% of holders control ~90% of voting power across major DAOs. More unequal than any country on earth.
We didn’t build digital democracies, we built hyper-efficient plutocracies.
delegation was supposed to fix that but it just compressed power further.
now it’s not even whales directly, it’s a handful of professional delegates, VC-aligned wallets, and service firms basically acting like proxy advisors.
the natural outcome of the design
Compound almost lost ~$25M because turnout was so low a coordinated minority could push proposals through
Beanstalk got drained $182M in a single block because voting power can be borrowed, used, and returned before anyone reacts
Arbitrum tried to “vote” on $1B that had already been moved
Uniswap governance literally gets shaped by which bridge a VC has exposure to
There many idea of something called governance 2.0 is trying to patch this
/ veTokens → align long term, but whales still dominate
/ delegation → improves efficiency, but centralizes harder
/ quadratic → nice theory, breaks under sybil
/ Optimism dual house → probably the most interesting, but still soft power sits with insiders
/ #AI delegates → might boost participation… or just create new control layer
none of these actually remove plutocracy. they just reshuffle who the top players are
honest frame imo is that DAOs are not decentralized systems. They are programmable plutocracies with transparent rules.
We, retail in this space, as market heading to
> #RWAs + real yield come in
> protocols sharing revenue
> governance directing real cash flows
governance tokens start being assets we accumulate to control capital allocation. That could be more sense of voting.