I just saw that Charles Hoskinson put pressure during a livestream about the Liqwid DAO voting. The topic is quite juicy: there are nearly one million dollars worth of NIGHT tokens at stake, and insiders want to vote on how they are distributed. The thing is, Hoskinson argued that this is wrong—if you're an insider and benefit from it, you shouldn't have a vote on that. It makes sense, right? Basically, he's calling for insiders to recuse themselves from governance when there's a conflict of interest. The problem is that these NIGHT tokens are tied to the Liqwid ADA market, so it's a serious ecosystem issue. Hoskinson believes that regular holders should decide the final allocation. It's interesting to see how governance is handled in these DAOs, honestly. What do you think—should insiders step back, or is it an overreaction?