In one of the most expensive copy-paste mistakes in blockchain history, a user lost 4,556 ETH valued at approximately $12.4 million. The incident serves as a chilling reminder that on decentralized networks, the system doesn’t care about your intentions—it only cares about wallet addresses. This wasn’t a sophisticated hack or a smart contract exploit; it was human error amplified by careless address handling.
A Pattern Worth Noting: Routine Transactions and Hidden Risks
The victim’s wallet had established a consistent pattern: regular deposits to Galaxy Digital using the same verified deposit address (0x6D90CC8Ce83B6D0ACf634ED45d4bCc37eDdD2E48). This routine created predictability—something an attacker could exploit. Security through repetition is often assumed, but it can become a liability if someone is watching your transaction history.
The Attacker’s Scheme: Crafting a Near-Perfect Fake Address
The perpetrator discovered this pattern and engineered an elaborate trap. They created a fraudulent address that appeared nearly identical to Galaxy Digital’s legitimate one: 0x6d908Bb7F81454d378194FF0E9f471334e592E48. To make their address seem legitimate, they deployed a technique known as “dust bombing”—sending tiny transactions to the victim’s address to populate their transaction history. These small, seemingly insignificant transfers were bait designed to make the fake address appear in recent transaction records.
The Moment Everything Changed: One Wrong Copy-Paste
About 11 hours ago, the victim initiated another deposit. Instead of manually entering the Galaxy Digital address or verifying it carefully, they made a fateful decision: they copied an address directly from their transaction history. In the blink of an eye, they selected the wrong one—the attacker’s address instead of the legitimate deposit address. The transaction was confirmed on the immutable blockchain. 4,556 ETH was gone instantly, transferred directly to the attacker’s wallet.
Critical Lessons for Every Wallet Owner
This incident underscores several essential security practices:
Never paste addresses from transaction history. Even though it seems like a convenient shortcut, transaction histories can be manipulated through dust attacks. Instead, verify addresses through official channels—the exchange’s website, a verified API, or a trusted bookmark.
Always double-check the first and last characters of any address before confirming a transaction, especially for large amounts. Attackers often mimic these visible portions while changing the middle sections.
Consider using hardware wallets with address verification displays. Some hardware wallets show full addresses on their secure screens, making it harder to make copy-paste errors.
Enable whitelisting features if your exchange or wallet supports them. This restricts withdrawals to pre-approved addresses only.
The blockchain’s immutability is both its greatest strength and its harshest judge. Once a transaction is sent to the wrong address, there’s no undo button. The $12.4M loss is permanent. In this case, a few seconds of carelessness cost millions—a stark reminder that in crypto, precision isn’t optional; it’s mandatory.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Dangers of Paste Errors: How a $12.4M ETH Loss Happened in Seconds
In one of the most expensive copy-paste mistakes in blockchain history, a user lost 4,556 ETH valued at approximately $12.4 million. The incident serves as a chilling reminder that on decentralized networks, the system doesn’t care about your intentions—it only cares about wallet addresses. This wasn’t a sophisticated hack or a smart contract exploit; it was human error amplified by careless address handling.
A Pattern Worth Noting: Routine Transactions and Hidden Risks
The victim’s wallet had established a consistent pattern: regular deposits to Galaxy Digital using the same verified deposit address (0x6D90CC8Ce83B6D0ACf634ED45d4bCc37eDdD2E48). This routine created predictability—something an attacker could exploit. Security through repetition is often assumed, but it can become a liability if someone is watching your transaction history.
The Attacker’s Scheme: Crafting a Near-Perfect Fake Address
The perpetrator discovered this pattern and engineered an elaborate trap. They created a fraudulent address that appeared nearly identical to Galaxy Digital’s legitimate one: 0x6d908Bb7F81454d378194FF0E9f471334e592E48. To make their address seem legitimate, they deployed a technique known as “dust bombing”—sending tiny transactions to the victim’s address to populate their transaction history. These small, seemingly insignificant transfers were bait designed to make the fake address appear in recent transaction records.
The Moment Everything Changed: One Wrong Copy-Paste
About 11 hours ago, the victim initiated another deposit. Instead of manually entering the Galaxy Digital address or verifying it carefully, they made a fateful decision: they copied an address directly from their transaction history. In the blink of an eye, they selected the wrong one—the attacker’s address instead of the legitimate deposit address. The transaction was confirmed on the immutable blockchain. 4,556 ETH was gone instantly, transferred directly to the attacker’s wallet.
Critical Lessons for Every Wallet Owner
This incident underscores several essential security practices:
Never paste addresses from transaction history. Even though it seems like a convenient shortcut, transaction histories can be manipulated through dust attacks. Instead, verify addresses through official channels—the exchange’s website, a verified API, or a trusted bookmark.
Always double-check the first and last characters of any address before confirming a transaction, especially for large amounts. Attackers often mimic these visible portions while changing the middle sections.
Consider using hardware wallets with address verification displays. Some hardware wallets show full addresses on their secure screens, making it harder to make copy-paste errors.
Enable whitelisting features if your exchange or wallet supports them. This restricts withdrawals to pre-approved addresses only.
The blockchain’s immutability is both its greatest strength and its harshest judge. Once a transaction is sent to the wrong address, there’s no undo button. The $12.4M loss is permanent. In this case, a few seconds of carelessness cost millions—a stark reminder that in crypto, precision isn’t optional; it’s mandatory.