Bitcoin has emerged as the world’s oldest digital asset, and as traditional financial institutions accelerate their entry into the space, a critical challenge has come to the fore: how to ensure transparency in bitcoin lending practices. Ledn, one of the world’s largest bitcoin lenders, has just unveiled a comprehensive framework that addresses the industry’s most pressing concern—proving that borrowed bitcoin collateral is actually held and not secretly rehypothecated.
The Transparency Crisis Plaguing Bitcoin Lending
The 2022 collapse of FTX, along with the subsequent bankruptcy filings of BlockFi, Celsius, and Voyager, exposed a dangerous pattern. Major cryptocurrency lenders operated with minimal disclosure about how they managed client assets, leaving borrowers vulnerable to hidden leverage and undisclosed risks. According to John Glover, Chief Investment Officer at Ledn and former Managing Director at Barclays, this created a fundamental power imbalance: “If lenders do not have to disclose how they use client collateral, the clients become the leverage.”
Today, that risk is multiplying. With the passage of the GENIUS Act paving the way for treasury-backed stablecoins, Wall Street firms including Citi, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, BNY Mellon, Schwab, and Bank of America are entering the bitcoin lending market. Yet regulatory standards remain fragmented. The U.S. and UK have refused to implement Basel’s proposed framework on crypto capital requirements, leaving rehypothecation practices largely ungovern. IOSCO continues pushing regulators to hold crypto custodians and lenders to traditional finance standards, but almost no institution has publicly disclosed how bitcoin collateral is actually managed or what happens during liquidation events.
Glover warned of an ominous parallel: “This is how we get a 2022-style lending crisis at institutional scale.”
Ledn’s Bitcoin Reserve Data Disclosure Framework
Recognizing this gap, Ledn recently launched its Open Book Report, establishing what the company describes as “the industry’s longest-running Proof of Reserves.” Rather than relying on self-reported wallet addresses or one-time snapshots, Ledn’s approach combines transparency with rigor through a dual-layer reporting structure.
The framework includes monthly disclosures of loan book metrics—outstanding loans, collateral posted, and average loan-to-value ratios—verified by The Network Firm LLP, a U.S.-based certified public accounting firm. Additionally, Ledn maintains semiannual Proof of Reserves attestations confirming that assets exceed client liabilities, utilizing Merkle tree methodology to allow individual clients to verify their balances are included in the reported figures.
This represents a fundamental shift in how the industry approaches transparency. As Glover explained, “True transparency requires independent reporting, regular updates, and methodologies anyone can check. Clients shouldn’t have to take anyone’s word for it.”
What the Bitcoin Collateral Data Reveals
According to the independently audited report, Ledn currently holds $868 million in outstanding bitcoin-backed loans, with 18,488 BTC posted as collateral. Critically, 100% of this collateral is held in on-chain addresses and custodial accounts verified by The Network Firm LLP—no rehypothecation, no undisclosed leverage.
The company’s average loan-to-value ratio stands at 55%, well below industry liquidation thresholds. This conservative approach provides a significant safety buffer, meaning bitcoin prices would need to collapse dramatically before any collateral positions approached forced liquidation. Since 2018, Ledn has funded $10.2 billion in lifetime loans across 47,000 originations while maintaining this disciplined risk management.
Independent Audits vs. Wallet Addresses: A New Standard Emerges
Ledn’s approach directly challenges the “proof of reserves” claims of other platforms that simply publish wallet addresses without independent verification. A wallet address proves ownership at a moment in time, but it reveals nothing about whether those assets are encumbered, whether the organization actually has authority over them, or what happens when market stress triggers liquidation cascades.
Ledn’s audited framework goes further. The Network Firm LLP independently confirms not just that bitcoin exists in specified addresses, but that Ledn maintains custody, that collateral levels match loan book claims, and that the company operates with conservative risk parameters. The monthly reporting cadence means transparency is not a one-time PR exercise but an ongoing commitment.
This distinction matters because Wall Street newcomers to bitcoin lending will face immense pressure to compete on lending terms, fees, and risk appetite. Ledn’s published standards now establish the baseline against which new entrants—particularly traditional financial institutions with less crypto experience—should be measured.
Lessons from 2022: Why Bitcoin Lenders Must Lead on Transparency
The blockchain industry has learned harsh lessons. When lenders operate without disclosure requirements, borrowers eventually pay the price. Celsius promised stability while secretly engaging in risky derivative trading. Voyager collapsed due to concentrated exposure to Three Arrows Capital. BlockFi’s relationship with Alameda Research (FTX’s trading arm) remained opaque until it was too late.
Ledn’s track record stands in stark contrast. The platform has navigated multiple market cycles, including the 2022 lending crisis itself, by maintaining conservative collateral requirements and transparent operations. The company’s recent strategic investment from Tether further signals confidence in its institutional-grade approach to asset management.
As more traditional financial institutions enter bitcoin lending, the industry faces a critical juncture. Either market participants establish rigorous, independent standards for transparency—or regulators will mandate them during the next crisis. Ledn’s Open Book Report represents a proactive commitment to the former approach, demonstrating that bitcoin lending can operate with the transparency standards of traditional finance while maintaining the efficiency of blockchain-native custody.
For investors and borrowers in the bitcoin lending space, the message is clear: demand the same rigor from all market participants that Ledn has now made the standard.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Bitcoin Lending Transparency: Why Proof of Reserves Matters as Institutions Enter the Crypto Market
Bitcoin has emerged as the world’s oldest digital asset, and as traditional financial institutions accelerate their entry into the space, a critical challenge has come to the fore: how to ensure transparency in bitcoin lending practices. Ledn, one of the world’s largest bitcoin lenders, has just unveiled a comprehensive framework that addresses the industry’s most pressing concern—proving that borrowed bitcoin collateral is actually held and not secretly rehypothecated.
The Transparency Crisis Plaguing Bitcoin Lending
The 2022 collapse of FTX, along with the subsequent bankruptcy filings of BlockFi, Celsius, and Voyager, exposed a dangerous pattern. Major cryptocurrency lenders operated with minimal disclosure about how they managed client assets, leaving borrowers vulnerable to hidden leverage and undisclosed risks. According to John Glover, Chief Investment Officer at Ledn and former Managing Director at Barclays, this created a fundamental power imbalance: “If lenders do not have to disclose how they use client collateral, the clients become the leverage.”
Today, that risk is multiplying. With the passage of the GENIUS Act paving the way for treasury-backed stablecoins, Wall Street firms including Citi, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, BNY Mellon, Schwab, and Bank of America are entering the bitcoin lending market. Yet regulatory standards remain fragmented. The U.S. and UK have refused to implement Basel’s proposed framework on crypto capital requirements, leaving rehypothecation practices largely ungovern. IOSCO continues pushing regulators to hold crypto custodians and lenders to traditional finance standards, but almost no institution has publicly disclosed how bitcoin collateral is actually managed or what happens during liquidation events.
Glover warned of an ominous parallel: “This is how we get a 2022-style lending crisis at institutional scale.”
Ledn’s Bitcoin Reserve Data Disclosure Framework
Recognizing this gap, Ledn recently launched its Open Book Report, establishing what the company describes as “the industry’s longest-running Proof of Reserves.” Rather than relying on self-reported wallet addresses or one-time snapshots, Ledn’s approach combines transparency with rigor through a dual-layer reporting structure.
The framework includes monthly disclosures of loan book metrics—outstanding loans, collateral posted, and average loan-to-value ratios—verified by The Network Firm LLP, a U.S.-based certified public accounting firm. Additionally, Ledn maintains semiannual Proof of Reserves attestations confirming that assets exceed client liabilities, utilizing Merkle tree methodology to allow individual clients to verify their balances are included in the reported figures.
This represents a fundamental shift in how the industry approaches transparency. As Glover explained, “True transparency requires independent reporting, regular updates, and methodologies anyone can check. Clients shouldn’t have to take anyone’s word for it.”
What the Bitcoin Collateral Data Reveals
According to the independently audited report, Ledn currently holds $868 million in outstanding bitcoin-backed loans, with 18,488 BTC posted as collateral. Critically, 100% of this collateral is held in on-chain addresses and custodial accounts verified by The Network Firm LLP—no rehypothecation, no undisclosed leverage.
The company’s average loan-to-value ratio stands at 55%, well below industry liquidation thresholds. This conservative approach provides a significant safety buffer, meaning bitcoin prices would need to collapse dramatically before any collateral positions approached forced liquidation. Since 2018, Ledn has funded $10.2 billion in lifetime loans across 47,000 originations while maintaining this disciplined risk management.
Independent Audits vs. Wallet Addresses: A New Standard Emerges
Ledn’s approach directly challenges the “proof of reserves” claims of other platforms that simply publish wallet addresses without independent verification. A wallet address proves ownership at a moment in time, but it reveals nothing about whether those assets are encumbered, whether the organization actually has authority over them, or what happens when market stress triggers liquidation cascades.
Ledn’s audited framework goes further. The Network Firm LLP independently confirms not just that bitcoin exists in specified addresses, but that Ledn maintains custody, that collateral levels match loan book claims, and that the company operates with conservative risk parameters. The monthly reporting cadence means transparency is not a one-time PR exercise but an ongoing commitment.
This distinction matters because Wall Street newcomers to bitcoin lending will face immense pressure to compete on lending terms, fees, and risk appetite. Ledn’s published standards now establish the baseline against which new entrants—particularly traditional financial institutions with less crypto experience—should be measured.
Lessons from 2022: Why Bitcoin Lenders Must Lead on Transparency
The blockchain industry has learned harsh lessons. When lenders operate without disclosure requirements, borrowers eventually pay the price. Celsius promised stability while secretly engaging in risky derivative trading. Voyager collapsed due to concentrated exposure to Three Arrows Capital. BlockFi’s relationship with Alameda Research (FTX’s trading arm) remained opaque until it was too late.
Ledn’s track record stands in stark contrast. The platform has navigated multiple market cycles, including the 2022 lending crisis itself, by maintaining conservative collateral requirements and transparent operations. The company’s recent strategic investment from Tether further signals confidence in its institutional-grade approach to asset management.
As more traditional financial institutions enter bitcoin lending, the industry faces a critical juncture. Either market participants establish rigorous, independent standards for transparency—or regulators will mandate them during the next crisis. Ledn’s Open Book Report represents a proactive commitment to the former approach, demonstrating that bitcoin lending can operate with the transparency standards of traditional finance while maintaining the efficiency of blockchain-native custody.
For investors and borrowers in the bitcoin lending space, the message is clear: demand the same rigor from all market participants that Ledn has now made the standard.