Recently, I saw someone propose using AI as the "referee" for prediction markets. My first reaction: it sounds great in theory, but in reality, it would be a disaster. You're not freeing humans' judgment with machines; you're asking traders to price another more bizarre variable—the probability that AI might make mistakes, be attacked, or be interfered with. Originally, the market only needed to consider whether an "event would happen," but now it also has to consider "AI"
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Recently, I saw someone propose using AI as the "referee" for prediction markets. My first reaction: it sounds great in theory, but in reality, it would be a disaster. You're not freeing humans' judgment with machines; you're asking traders to price another more bizarre variable—the probability that AI might make mistakes, be attacked, or be interfered with. Originally, the market only needed to consider whether an "event would happen," but now it also has to consider "AI"