#数字资产市场动态 Chairman of the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee, John Bozeman, disclosed on Thursday the committee's version of the cryptocurrency regulation legislation. From the perspective of decentralized finance, there has indeed been some progress, but Bozeman admitted that there are still significant disagreements between the two parties on "core policy positions," and the final implementation will require going through many procedures.



The Democrats' concerns are mainly not about the provisions themselves—sources revealed that they are more politically motivated. They are worried about Trump's and his affiliates' interests in crypto projects, as well as concerns over insufficient consumer protection.

According to Senate rules, such legislation requires bipartisan support to pass, with a threshold of 60 votes. In other words, even if all Republican senators support it, at least 7 Democratic votes are needed. Both the Agriculture Committee and the Banking Committee need to review and vote on it separately, with the Agriculture Committee's review scheduled for next week.

The problem is that the Banking Committee has already hit a snag. A major trading platform previously withdrew its support, causing delays in the review process. There are many points of controversy—tokenized stocks, the division of regulatory authority over DeFi, the boundaries of SEC and CFTC functions, and the incentive design for stablecoins. According to reports, the Banking Committee may postpone crypto legislation for a few weeks and instead focus on addressing housing affordability issues.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainProspectorvip
· 11h ago
It's the same old two-party bickering routine, with the 60-vote threshold clearly designed to choke off crypto. This wave of Democratic voices is nothing but political maneuvering; the crypto business on Trump's side is already sensitive. The Banking Committee really dropped the ball. A single exchange changing its stance can delay things, showing there's no real consensus. Still have to wait a few weeks? The market can't wait, my friend. Regulation has never been about helping retail investors; whether this bill passes or not, it's big institutions harvesting profits.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 11h ago
It's the same old political game again. Can it really pass? It feels like it's forever out of reach. Why is the Democratic Party still debating Trump's issues? Can't they focus on consumer protection first? The Banking Committee keeps delaying, it seems exchanges are also starting to pass the buck. The crypto bill is cooling off; 60 votes are too hard to get. The division of regulatory authority over DeFi has always been chaotic, and the SEC and CFTC have never clarified it. Stablecoins are like hot potatoes; no one wants to be the first to move. So we still have to wait a few more months, right? American efficiency is truly unmatched.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManagervip
· 11h ago
The 60-vote threshold... This is political maneuvering. Matters that require 7 votes are often the hardest to handle. I think this bill won't be settled for at least half a year.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtistvip
· 11h ago
It's just another political game, really annoying. Wait, the exchange is withdrawing support? How scared are they? Starting from 60 votes, the Democrats are still bickering; this bill probably won't pass this year. Lack of consumer protection? Definitely needs regulation; it was too chaotic before. I just want to know when I can safely develop blockchain games; right now, it's all just regulatory rumors.
View OriginalReply0
SerNgmivip
· 11h ago
It's the same political game again, claiming that consumer protection is insufficient—what a joke, who cares? Exchanges keep jumping back and forth; this move is quite damaging. Damn, I have to wait a few weeks again; this speed is slower than a snail. By the way, does no one investigate Trump's conflict of interest? DeFi isn't even fully understood yet, and now they're tokenizing stocks; regulation is becoming more and more complex. The 60-vote threshold is really a bottleneck; it's just a matter of 7 votes. What is the Banking Committee doing? Are they busy with real estate? Crypto really can't get any respect.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 11h ago
ah great, more legislative theater while i'm over here sweating gas prices lmao. 60 votes needed, dems pulling political moves, banking committee ghosting... honestly this whole thing reeks of delays that'll tank my txn windows fr fr
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)