Recently, while researching the Web3 infrastructure ecosystem, I spent quite some time looking into decentralized storage. The deeper I delved, the more I realized that there is a project in this space with a particularly interesting approach — it completely rethinks the data security problem from a different perspective.
First, let's talk about the current situation. What are we long accustomed to? Centralized cloud services like Alibaba Cloud, AWS, Tencent Cloud. Stable performance and smooth experience — these advantages are undeniable. But the problem is — fundamentally, it relies on trusting a single server or platform. Once that platform fails or data is tampered with, users have no real control over their data. This is the inherent shortcoming of the centralized model.
In contrast, these decentralized storage projects take a completely different path. The core logic is quite straightforward: split, encode, and then disperse storage of data. What are the benefits of doing this? First, it eliminates single point of failure risks; second, data becomes verifiable and has long-term availability guarantees.
For the Web3 ecosystem, this is extremely critical. Imagine NFT images and metadata, asset data in blockchain games, or even AI training data — without a reliable decentralized storage backing, these things are essentially in a state of "name only," with no real substance. Without a secure storage layer, all applications built on top are just castles in the air.
From a technical architecture perspective, these projects are not simply doing "decentralized cloud storage." The real problem they aim to solve is: how can off-chain data be stored efficiently, securely, and sustainably? This may sound like a basic issue, but within the entire Web3 ecosystem, it is seriously underestimated.
Looking at it from another angle, once the upper-layer applications truly explode — the prosperity of the NFT market, the growth of blockchain games, the integration of AI and blockchain — the demand for underlying storage will grow exponentially. That’s why I am optimistic about these infrastructure projects. They are more like the utilities of an ecosystem — water, electricity, and gas — rather than short-term speculative targets. In the long run, they are the truly profitable tracks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLover
· 9h ago
Indeed, infrastructure is the true foundation that can last the longest.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 9h ago
Wow, someone finally explained this thoroughly. I used to think decentralized storage was just a gimmick, but now I understand—this is truly infrastructure.
The idea of distributed storage is indeed excellent; avoiding single point of failure makes it worth it.
There have been so many cases of NFT images disappearing, and honestly, it's because the underlying technology isn't solid enough. We need to take it seriously.
When Web3 will truly explode depends mainly on whether the infrastructure is strong enough, and this guy is right.
Wait, which project is it exactly? Are they the same old ones or are there new players?
In the long run, it's definitely more reliable than short-term speculation, but is it a bit late to get in now?
The biggest test for this kind of infrastructure project is execution; theory can be perfect, but implementation is key.
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 9h ago
What, it really can solve the storage problem of NFTs? Why do I always feel like this is still far away?
Centralized storage is indeed unreliable, but can the decentralized approach really be reliable? Basically, it's a gamble on the ecosystem's explosion.
This logic sounds good, but it depends on which project's implementation can truly be realized.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 9h ago
Speaking of storage, it has indeed been underestimated, but the real key to making money is still who can survive until the day of application explosion.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 10h ago
That's right, infrastructure is the real deal.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 10h ago
Honestly, decentralized storage has indeed been underestimated.
Exactly right, centralized cloud services are a ticking time bomb; once they rug, you'll have nothing left. This guy sees through the infrastructure—it's not just hype, he's genuinely addressing the pain points of the ecosystem. When blockchain games and NFTs truly explode, the demand for storage layers will skyrocket. Those who are positioning now will be the ones laughing last.
Recently, while researching the Web3 infrastructure ecosystem, I spent quite some time looking into decentralized storage. The deeper I delved, the more I realized that there is a project in this space with a particularly interesting approach — it completely rethinks the data security problem from a different perspective.
First, let's talk about the current situation. What are we long accustomed to? Centralized cloud services like Alibaba Cloud, AWS, Tencent Cloud. Stable performance and smooth experience — these advantages are undeniable. But the problem is — fundamentally, it relies on trusting a single server or platform. Once that platform fails or data is tampered with, users have no real control over their data. This is the inherent shortcoming of the centralized model.
In contrast, these decentralized storage projects take a completely different path. The core logic is quite straightforward: split, encode, and then disperse storage of data. What are the benefits of doing this? First, it eliminates single point of failure risks; second, data becomes verifiable and has long-term availability guarantees.
For the Web3 ecosystem, this is extremely critical. Imagine NFT images and metadata, asset data in blockchain games, or even AI training data — without a reliable decentralized storage backing, these things are essentially in a state of "name only," with no real substance. Without a secure storage layer, all applications built on top are just castles in the air.
From a technical architecture perspective, these projects are not simply doing "decentralized cloud storage." The real problem they aim to solve is: how can off-chain data be stored efficiently, securely, and sustainably? This may sound like a basic issue, but within the entire Web3 ecosystem, it is seriously underestimated.
Looking at it from another angle, once the upper-layer applications truly explode — the prosperity of the NFT market, the growth of blockchain games, the integration of AI and blockchain — the demand for underlying storage will grow exponentially. That’s why I am optimistic about these infrastructure projects. They are more like the utilities of an ecosystem — water, electricity, and gas — rather than short-term speculative targets. In the long run, they are the truly profitable tracks.