2026-01-23 00:00:47

Honestly, looking at the development of the entire public chain track over this period, I am somewhat tired of it.

Everyone is frantically showing off TPS data or still talking about the dazzling "full decentralization" story. But after being in this circle for a long time, you’ll realize a harsh reality: what really blocks Mass Adoption is not how fast the chain is, but how "smooth" the entire business process is.

What does this "smooth" refer to? It’s about those hidden costs beneath the surface—how to pass compliance checks? How to calculate carbon emissions? How to make traditional business giants feel at ease and willing to jump in? These are the real bottlenecks that can threaten lives.

**Not aiming to be the "Ethereum Killer," but rather a "Web2 Conduit"**

When I look at the ideas of some emerging public chains, what impresses me most is how cleverly they bypass the overused "EVM compatibility" standard, instead targeting the vertical tracks of "entertainment" and "branding."

Looking at it from another perspective, if I were a Web2 game developer or luxury brand with millions of users, and I wanted to enter Web3, what would I fear the most?

I’m not worried about the chain being too trendy or "Web3" enough; I fear that users will leave because of a one or two cent interaction cost. I’m even more worried about my financial reports being tarnished by high energy consumption on the blockchain, affecting ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings.

This is the real-world business calculation. The design logic of some new public chains clearly targets these "psychological barriers," trying to find ways to cut down those heavy burdens...

ETH-0,1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerRugResistant

· 13h ago

That's right, TPS is just show-off. In the end, we still have to deal with real-world worries. Compliance, costs, ESG—these are the things that can truly kill a project. Chasing the "Ethereum killer" tag is outdated. Instead of showing off muscles to follow trends, it's better to honestly pave the way for Web2 giants. Games and brands are really the breakthroughs; these two sectors have money and people. But the problem is, how many chains have really figured out this issue? Most are still just bragging.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 20h ago

From the perspective of bypassing EVM to develop games and brand tracks, it's quite clear-headed and much more reliable than projects that constantly hype TPS. Honestly, the public chains that can truly survive might not need to kill anyone at all; just convincing Web2 users to come in is enough. Cost and compliance are the real issues, and that's spot on. But even if they do come in, don't expect much; it's still about whether the team is reliable or not.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 20h ago

Well said. Instead of hurting each other and showing off TPS, it's better to think about what Web2 giants truly care about.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 20h ago

Honestly, this analysis hits the nail on the head. No matter how high TPS is, it's useless; gas fees still eat into users' wallets. EVM compatibility has become a fierce competition, but I’m more impressed by the approach of deepening vertical tracks. If big companies are to come in, their concerns must be addressed one by one. The most heartbreaking part is ESG; getting hit by a financial report is even more painful than a chain slowdown. No wonder some new public chains are starting to promote a "green" image. This is truly the second half of Web3, not a technical competition, but how to make Web2 users sleep comfortably.

View OriginalReply0

BlindBoxVictim

· 20h ago

That's so right. The TPS data has long been a matter of aesthetic fatigue; true players have already seen through it. --- Compliance and cost are the real keys. This really hits the nail on the head for me; I've always thought these public chains were overhyping themselves. --- Haha, I've never heard of Web2's extraditioner idea before, but it's definitely more reliable than another Ethereum killer. --- Oh, the brand side doesn't care about decentralization or Web3 at all; they just want something cheap and hassle-free, and that's exactly right. --- Regarding ESG black spots, CFOs of big companies would definitely frown upon it. No wonder some chains put so much effort into energy consumption. --- Bypassing EVM compatibility to cut costs and directly focus on entertainment and luxury goods—this approach actually has some real substance. --- It's heartbreaking to see users leave just because of a few cents in interaction fees. Big transactions can tell right away that this is a genuine pain point. --- It feels like understanding the smoothness of business processes is much clearer now, much more than those who keep talking about revolution all day.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 20h ago

Oh wow, this is the real truth. TPS has been hyped for so long, but it still comes down to cost and compliance. That's right, I just wanted to get in, who cares about decentralization or not. I never thought that luxury brands would be afraid of ESG black spots, makes sense. This approach is indeed clever, not fighting Ethereum, but instead becoming the pioneer of traditional big companies. Suddenly I realize that after all this time of browsing chains, I finally understand what business logic is, which is a bit embarrassing. I feel like this is what public chains should be thinking about. Can all those TPS numbers really feed us?

View OriginalReply0