A major public chain foundation recently made two purchases totaling 150,000 USDT to acquire a project. It is rumored that the next target is likely another popular coin. I also followed the trend and entered after the foundation's involvement, but ultimately I exited at a loss—the coin started to decline continuously after launching on DEX, and the market conditions are indeed not ideal. It seems that the foundation's buying does not always guarantee subsequent gains; instead, it is more prudent to observe the market performance carefully afterward.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 22h ago
The foundation paying the bill ≠ capital guarantee note. I fell into this trap once before and woke up.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 22h ago
Foundation buying does not equal guaranteed rise; this lesson was too painful.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 22h ago
The foundation paying the bill can't save trash coins either. Following the trend is really just throwing money away.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 22h ago
Foundation endorsement ≠ guaranteed profit; following the trend is a sure way to get sick
A major public chain foundation recently made two purchases totaling 150,000 USDT to acquire a project. It is rumored that the next target is likely another popular coin. I also followed the trend and entered after the foundation's involvement, but ultimately I exited at a loss—the coin started to decline continuously after launching on DEX, and the market conditions are indeed not ideal. It seems that the foundation's buying does not always guarantee subsequent gains; instead, it is more prudent to observe the market performance carefully afterward.