Last year, I met an engineer who has been working in the payments industry for over ten years. While tinkering with cross-border payment interfaces, he was complaining—"You blockchain folks always say you want to disrupt payments, but where is the chain that actually makes stablecoin settlements easy for small merchants without worrying about Gas fees or slippage?" I honestly couldn't answer at the time.



Recently, I spent a lot of time studying Plasma's tech stack and on-chain ecosystem, and only then did I start to see the potential way forward for this new chain. It's not the kind of hype that claims millions of TPS but turns out to be fragile in practice. Instead, it redefines how stablecoins and DeFi are used from the ground up.

Regarding Plasma, the most eye-catching data is: just three weeks after its mainnet launch, it attracted $8 billion in TVL, directly ranking in the top ten on-chain. The numbers are impressive, but the underlying logic is even more worth discussing.

Most lending protocols on current chains operate independently—Aave builds its own liquidity, and Compound has to do the same, resulting in the entire market being fragmented into pieces. Plasma is different. It has a foundational component called Fluid that directly separates the liquidity layer, turning it into a shared public infrastructure accessible to all upper-layer applications. Whether it's lending or DEXs, as long as you build on Plasma, you automatically connect to the same liquidity pool. This change significantly boosts capital efficiency by several orders of magnitude.

The core innovation lies in Plasma's use of a technology called "Range Positions" to completely overhaul the liquidation mechanism. Traditional lending protocols' liquidations work like this: price fluctuations → trigger liquidation threshold → wipe out all positions → executor profits from the spread. The process is rigid and especially unfriendly to small loans. Fluid's approach is more precise—it doesn't forcibly liquidate everything but dynamically adjusts based on real-time risk, maximizing capital utilization while reducing the risk of lenders being liquidated.
XPL1,32%
AAVE-0,58%
COMP-1,36%
FLUID1,31%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityNinjavip
· 20h ago
80 billion in three weeks honestly is a bit hard to sustain, but the idea of Fluid's liquidity layer really hits the core --- Exactly, the previous hype about chains was all talk, but the Gas fees could kill you. This time, someone is finally doing surgery at the root --- The scope position strategy feels like it’s tailor-made for small merchants, unlike traditional lending which is one-size-fits-all --- Will capital efficiency increase by several orders of magnitude? Alright, I’m waiting to see how this data will be implemented --- Haha, good question. Now, what’s the engineer’s reaction to Plasma? --- Fluid’s independent liquidity layer is truly innovative, but whether it can sustain future growth depends on the follow-up --- Every chain claims to revolutionize payments, but at least Plasma isn’t just blowing smoke this time --- Sharing liquidity pools like this two years ago, no one would dare design it that way. Not bad, not bad
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8vip
· 20h ago
This Plasma is really no joke; achieving 8 billion TVL in three weeks is indeed impressive.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 20h ago
Bro, this time Plasma might really not be just a scam to fleece the newbies.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMastervip
· 20h ago
It's the same old TPS hype trick, this time with a new skin? Wait, Fluid's dynamic clearing system actually has some substance... That guy who talked about Gas fees is right, someone should have done this a long time ago. 8 billion in three weeks? Let's see if it can survive until the next bear market. Liquidity sharing sounds good, but can the fragmentation problem really be solved? That's why I remain bearish on most new chains. Range positions... another bunch of flashy buzzwords, can they really help small merchants? Seriously, Plasma might actually be heading in the right direction.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4745f9cevip
· 20h ago
8 billion in three weeks? That number sounds impressive, but it depends on whether Fluid's liquidity sharing system can really be implemented and used. Otherwise, it's just another round of FOMO.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)