In the Dusk ecosystem, whether a transaction can be officially recognized by the system is not primarily determined by speed. The real bottleneck lies in—does it pass the proof system? If the proof doesn't pass, the transaction on the chain is effectively meaningless.

Dusk takes a rather rigorous approach. Once a transaction is initiated, it must satisfy multiple sets of constraints simultaneously. The key is that these constraints are not checked only during execution as temporary measures, but are directly embedded into the proof logic. Whether the asset states are correct, if account conditions are met, or if the rules are self-consistent—all are intercepted during the proof phase. There is no "execute first, then rollback" operation, nor an opportunity to "change the state first and explain afterward."

The most hardcore aspect of this design is that Dusk also defines "rule conflicts" as a type of provable failure state. Many systems' rule conflicts are discovered only after deployment by users and then fixed through emergency patches. Dusk's mechanism forces you to clearly articulate the rules before the transaction occurs. If the rules are vague, proof generation fails, and the transaction cannot even enter the system. In other words, the system refuses to accept ambiguous rules; it only recognizes rule sets that can be proven to be valid.

This also explains why Dusk's compliance logic is more like a "hard constraint" rather than a "soft promise." Compliance is not just a slogan, nor something controlled by a backend toggle; it is the first gate a transaction must pass through. Without passing this gate, the transaction has no qualification to proceed to state transition.

The key point now is to observe whether Dusk can uphold this mechanism to the end. That is, whether all state changes must first pass through the proof constraints, and whether there exists any way to bypass proof and directly modify the state. Holding these two lines ensures that Dusk truly turns complex rules into system facts, rather than just ideal visions in documentation.