In the crypto world, whether a project is reliable often depends on the team's background and the partners they choose. The Dusk Foundation team has an impressive track record in traditional finance and cryptography, and more importantly, their collaboration with NPEX is not just a marketing gimmick but a genuine product-level deep integration. What does this approach indicate? It shows that they know how to work with the traditional financial system and understand what the market actually needs.
Compared to projects that only hype concepts, this grounded approach in practical application inspires more confidence. If the Dusk team can maintain this momentum and elevate their ecosystem products to a level recognized by the mainstream market, that will be truly impressive. Based on current trends, this direction is the right one.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainArchaeologist
· 15h ago
Another reliable team, this is the kind of image that the crypto world should have.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 15h ago
Really, projects that truly connect with traditional finance are indeed scarce, unlike some projects that just boast.
This is real work—strong team backgrounds combined with product-level collaborations are much more reliable than just hearing stories.
If it can really be implemented, Dusk might have a chance.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 15h ago
According to on-chain data, the TVL growth stability of this deep integration cooperation model is indeed about 2.3 times higher than that of concept hype projects.
Based on historical case analysis, teams that truly focus on product integration have a significantly higher survival rate. However, a risk reminder—exchange cooperation does not equal market recognition; actual trading volume data is still needed.
It can be analyzed from three dimensions: the credibility of the team’s background, the authenticity of product integration, and market demand matching... By the way, how is Dusk’s current TVL share? Is there specific data supporting this optimistic trend?
It’s worth noting that a traditional financial background does not necessarily mean the ability to handle on-chain risk control. The logical differences between these two systems are quite significant.
Honestly, compared to those projects that only shout slogans, this one does seem to have some substance. But don’t be overly optimistic; it’s necessary to continue observing the data performance over several quarters before drawing conclusions.
The biggest risk for this type of Bridge project is policy changes. No matter how perfect the integration, encountering a regulatory storm would be futile.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 15h ago
Now there's finally someone reliable to get things done, not just the kind who brags all day long.
In the crypto world, whether a project is reliable often depends on the team's background and the partners they choose. The Dusk Foundation team has an impressive track record in traditional finance and cryptography, and more importantly, their collaboration with NPEX is not just a marketing gimmick but a genuine product-level deep integration. What does this approach indicate? It shows that they know how to work with the traditional financial system and understand what the market actually needs.
Compared to projects that only hype concepts, this grounded approach in practical application inspires more confidence. If the Dusk team can maintain this momentum and elevate their ecosystem products to a level recognized by the mainstream market, that will be truly impressive. Based on current trends, this direction is the right one.