2026-01-22 17:00:20

On January 22nd, Solana Mobile officially posted a Chinese-language tweet to thank the Chinese-speaking community. The tweet stated: "Thank you to all Chinese Seekers for your support. We welcome more Chinese Builders to jointly define the future of mobile crypto."

This message reflects Solana's emphasis on the Asian market, especially the Chinese-speaking community. As mobile Web3 applications become more popular, the Solana ecosystem is actively expanding its developer base, attracting more local creators to participate. From gaming to DeFi to social applications, Chinese Builders have already demonstrated many innovative ideas in the mobile crypto space. This move by Solana also indicates that those who can better integrate global developer efforts will be in a more advantageous position in the next wave of ecosystem competition.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVHunterX

· 20h ago

Sure, Solana finally remembered the Chinese community. Better late than never.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 20h ago

Haha, Solana really wants to dominate the Asian market. This wave of Chinese Twitter posts is amazing. --- Chinese builders do have some strengths, but speaking of just gratitude, what’s the use? Can we get some real incentives? --- Global developer ecosystem integration? Sounds good, but in the end, it’s all about who has more money and who has the final say. --- Mobile Web3... sounds exciting. Finally, an ecosystem that takes mobile seriously. --- Thanks, thanks. The tactics are all the same, but I have to say Solana’s execution speed is indeed faster than other public chains. --- Chinese creators have been working on the chain for a long time. It’s a bit ironic to wait for the official to thank them. --- This is a standard ecosystem expansion strategy, but the actual results depend on subsequent resource investment. --- The bad news is everyone is recruiting people; the good news is that fierce ecosystem competition indicates real potential.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityJanitor

· 20h ago

Haha, Solana is finally starting to pay attention to Chinese developers. They really want a piece of the pie this time. The Solana ecosystem can only grow with the support of builders from all over, relying solely on official hype is useless. Chinese creativity is indeed strong; it all depends on whether they can truly provide resources and support, rather than just verbal encouragement. In the past few months, mobile chains have indeed become popular. Whoever captures Chinese developers first will have the upper hand. It feels like the right direction, but it all depends on how they follow up; otherwise, it’s just a marketing gimmick.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 20h ago

Hype around the Solana track is high, but it still depends on how Chinese builders play it. Hmm... This wave of Solana definitely understands community operation, but on the other hand, can they really provide developers with some practical support? Another ecosystem player trying to cut the leeks? Let’s see how many Chinese builders actually make money first. Thanks, thanks, but in the end, let the code speak—this is the real truth. Is Solana truly making a comeback this time, or is it just marketing? But speaking of Chinese communities, there are indeed some things. It’s easy to talk about integrating developers’ efforts, but actually allocating resources is another matter. Do you think this move by Solana can change its reputation in the Chinese-speaking community? I remain skeptical. Here we go again, it all depends on how the subsequent real monetary incentives will work.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHermit

· 20h ago

Now they're starting to cater to the Chinese community, but to be honest, Solana's move was indeed clever.

View OriginalReply0