Only three weeks since the mainnet went live, and Dusk's governance proposals take an average of only 7 days from initiation to on-chain deployment? This level of efficiency is indeed a bit outrageous. The recent Hedger V2 optimization proposal is the best proof—staking holders can directly see the changes, unlike proposals that sit around for a long time without any action.
Currently, the staking ratio has exceeded 37%, and ecosystem participation has significantly increased. From the data, at a $0.105 price point for $DUSK, governance activity and token support form a positive feedback loop. Rather than saying governance is just a project allocation, it has become the engine that drives Dusk's daily iteration and optimization.
Such an efficient execution closed loop is rarely seen in many projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MevHunter
· 18h ago
7 days from proposal to on-chain? Wow, that's not realistic. Other projects would take a couple of months to get it done.
The staking ratio is already at 37%, this data is indeed quite impressive.
DUSK is really getting things done this time, unlike some projects that just propose and then call it a day.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 18h ago
7 days from proposal to on-chain? That's pretty intense, but it seems like Dusk is really serious about getting things done.
There are too many projects that just talk but don't do; tangible iterations like this are the real deal.
Staking over 37%+ indicates that people still believe.
Being able to sustain this feedback loop would be impressive.
However, at the price of 0.105, the future direction depends on whether the execution can stay steady.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPrice
· 18h ago
7 days from proposal to on-chain? Is this really true, or just another marketing story?
Wait, a staking ratio of 37%, isn't this data a bit too good to be true?
To be honest, I care more about how $DUSK will move forward. Even if governance becomes more efficient, if the coin price crashes, it's all pointless.
Dusk is indeed doing serious work this time, unlike some projects that just talk but don't act.
37% staking sounds good, but it depends on whether these people truly believe or are just arbitraging.
Not many projects can turn governance into an engine, I have to admit that.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 18h ago
7 days from proposal to on-chain? What kind of demon and ghost project is this, is it real or fake?
Wait, staking is over 37%? That’s definitely different, someone is running away.
To be honest, most project governance is just a display, but this one really seems to be moving.
If the price at 0.105 continues to have people staking, the feedback could indeed be valid.
Only three weeks since the mainnet went live, and Dusk's governance proposals take an average of only 7 days from initiation to on-chain deployment? This level of efficiency is indeed a bit outrageous. The recent Hedger V2 optimization proposal is the best proof—staking holders can directly see the changes, unlike proposals that sit around for a long time without any action.
Currently, the staking ratio has exceeded 37%, and ecosystem participation has significantly increased. From the data, at a $0.105 price point for $DUSK, governance activity and token support form a positive feedback loop. Rather than saying governance is just a project allocation, it has become the engine that drives Dusk's daily iteration and optimization.
Such an efficient execution closed loop is rarely seen in many projects.