This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSqueezer
· 01-22 14:50
sacks this old brother is once again hyping big plans. If banks really start to enter on a large scale, will we small retail investors still have a way out...
---
Wait, can interest-earning stablecoins really force banks to get involved? Feels not that simple.
---
Fusion is just fusion, anyway the final profits still go to big institutions, retail investors are always the ones being harvested.
---
What the White House advisor says isn't necessarily reliable. Remember the last time they hyped it up and the outcome was the same.
---
Interest-earning stablecoins are indeed a good thing, but think about what will happen once banks really come in...
---
Are regulators really going to make a firm decision? Then I need to seize this opportunity quickly.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 01-22 14:38
Forced to enter the market? Ha, I’d like to see how they keep up with the yield of stablecoins.
View OriginalReply0
nft_widow
· 01-22 14:29
The story of banks being forced to step in... sounds good but I still have some doubts. Who knows how long it will take until that day actually comes.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWell
· 01-22 14:22
Oh wow, truly integrated? Since the day banks entered the scene, traditional finance has been out of the picture; it's all crypto now.
Will yield-bearing stablecoins force banks into the crypto industry? David Sacks offers new insights
Source: Cryptonews Original Title: Will yield-bearing stablecoins force banks into the crypto industry? David Sacks offers new insights Original Link:
金融体系融合趋势
White House加密政策顾问David Sacks表示,随着美国监管框架不断完善,传统银行与数字资产之间的界限将逐步消除。
Sacks预测,加密货币、稳定币和银行最终将融合成一个统一的数字资产产业。一旦通过全面的加密市场结构立法,银行将大规模进入加密领域,传统金融与区块链系统之间的边界将被抹去。
稳定币收益率的关键争议
当前美国加密立法中的核心争议涉及稳定币发行方是否应被允许向持有者支付收益。Sacks解释称,银行的反对主要围绕这一问题展开,但他指出GENIUS Act中已经嵌入了某种形式的收益机制,意味着无论银行如何抵触,这一机制都可能存在。
Sacks认为,如果银行无法达成妥协,他们可能会在收益型稳定币出现时失去竞争优势。他强调,全面的市场结构法比任何单一条款都更为重要。
银行立场的转变
Sacks指出,银行最初会抵触收益型稳定币,但一旦他们自身成为稳定币业务的参与者,这种立场将改变。随着时间推移,银行预计会将收益视为统一数字资产框架内的竞争优势。
一旦监管清晰度建立,稳定币可能成为加密原生企业和传统金融机构的核心产品。
技术竞争背景
Sacks还涉及了美国与中国在人工智能和半导体技术中的竞争。他指出,中国越来越关注自给自足,特别是通过国内企业推进。中国正在建立自己的技术生态系统,而非依赖美国芯片制造商。
Sacks表示,美国战略一直是允许中国获得上一代芯片,以通过占据市场份额来减缓扩展。然而,他承认随着中国继续走向技术独立,这种方法可能变得效果有限。
监管环境与创新速度
Sacks对比了不同行政时期的监管环境,指出在特朗普时期,科技行业获得了更强有力的支持和更少的监管约束,相比之下拜登政府的监管压力更大。在他看来,减少的监管压力使加密和人工智能领域的创新能够更快推进。
政策走向
这些评论表明,美国加密政策正朝着将数字资产与传统金融整合的方向发展,而非隔离。稳定币、银行和区块链基础设施越来越被视为同一金融体系的组成部分。
如果实现监管清晰度并扩大机构参与,加密采用可能加速。这位顾问的声明指向了一个转变:加密可能不再被视为替代系统,而是现代金融的基础层。