What is the true scarcity of Dusk Foundation? Many people say it's technologically advanced, but that's not actually the case.
Since 2018, when building Layer 1, Dusk made a different choice — directly assuming that regulated assets, compliant business processes, and auditable financial logic would run on-chain. This is not a post-hoc compromise, but a core part of its design from the very beginning.
What does this lead to? The overall protocol's character becomes "conservative but reliable."
Zero-knowledge proofs are not used to hide rules, but to prove that rules are being followed; auditability is built directly into the consensus and execution layers, making regulatory verification a native on-chain operation; modular architecture reserves independent operational space for RWA, security-type assets, and institutional-grade DeFi, effectively isolating systemic coupling risks.
In other words, it is not mimicking traditional finance methods, but has designed from the ground up to accommodate real assets and real financial processes.
When the market truly begins to need blockchains capable of holding real assets, the value coordinates of such projects will be thoroughly re-evaluated.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretter
· 01-22 19:10
Oh, this is truly a realization
Compliance is not something to think about later, but the original design concept? This line of thinking is indeed clear
When the crypto world is all about promoting "decentralization overthrowing everything," projects that actively embrace regulatory genes will actually win
The RWA market has not truly exploded yet, and only then will we know who is serious
Wait, are you saying Dusk is actually betting on institutional-level applications? That feels a bit too advanced
By the way, are these types of projects currently underestimated or ignored?
Indeed, when traditional finance starts to play with blockchain, you should look for this kind of thing
Conservative but reliable, it sounds like you're talking about a friend who isn't flashy but really dependable
I just want to ask, how many projects in the market are still seriously following this design philosophy?
It's good if it's well said, but it all depends on whether we can hold on until that day
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 01-22 13:30
Hey, this is the kind of chain I want to see, not the kind that brags all day long.
Regulatory-friendly design built-in from the start? It really feels like these people understand what institutions need.
Once the RWA era arrives, this thing should double in value.
Honestly, it's more visionary than those who boast about decentralization to the end.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 01-22 13:30
This is the truly compliant chain, not the kind that is forced to compromise.
---
Basically, it's about wanting to be a legitimate force from the core, unlike some who only realize the importance of compliance later.
---
Is zero-knowledge proof used to demonstrate rule-following rather than concealment? This approach is indeed clear-headed, much higher than the privacy coin set.
---
Institutional funds are really about to enter on a large scale, and only then can the advantages of this kind of underlying design be realized. It's still too early.
---
Being conservative but reliable may sound unsexy, but this is the prerequisite for pension funds to come in.
---
RWA will eventually explode; those currently bottom-fishing are betting on this point.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 01-22 13:21
Honestly, this is the approach I want to see the most. It's not about hype, but truly designed for RWA and institutional-level players.
Embedding compliance genes from the ground up—it's easy to talk about but deadly to implement. Most protocols grow wildly first and then add regulatory layers later. Dusk's approach is the opposite, inherently enhancing reliability.
Only when genuine institutional funds enter the market will we see who is truly serious.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuyer
· 01-22 13:17
This is the future. Compliance is not a shackle but a moat.
---
Honestly, this idea struck me as brilliant the first time I heard it. Considering regulation from the gene level? Others are just hyping concepts.
---
Wait, ZK is used to prove rules are followed rather than hidden... This reverse thinking is a bit ruthless.
---
RWA reserves an independent space, which is indeed impressive. The risk isolation design is different.
---
Now everyone pursues permissionless decentralization. Dusk operates in reverse; once institutions really come in, they'll understand.
---
I laughed at the conservative but reliable positioning. Similar things exist in the crypto world.
---
Thought this way back in 2018... If I had known, I should have laid low.
What is the true scarcity of Dusk Foundation? Many people say it's technologically advanced, but that's not actually the case.
Since 2018, when building Layer 1, Dusk made a different choice — directly assuming that regulated assets, compliant business processes, and auditable financial logic would run on-chain. This is not a post-hoc compromise, but a core part of its design from the very beginning.
What does this lead to? The overall protocol's character becomes "conservative but reliable."
Zero-knowledge proofs are not used to hide rules, but to prove that rules are being followed; auditability is built directly into the consensus and execution layers, making regulatory verification a native on-chain operation; modular architecture reserves independent operational space for RWA, security-type assets, and institutional-grade DeFi, effectively isolating systemic coupling risks.
In other words, it is not mimicking traditional finance methods, but has designed from the ground up to accommodate real assets and real financial processes.
When the market truly begins to need blockchains capable of holding real assets, the value coordinates of such projects will be thoroughly re-evaluated.