**Flow's Hasty Rollback Plan Leaves Major Cross-Chain Partners in the Dark—deBridge Raises Critical Ecosystem Concerns**

The proposed blockchain state rollback by Flow has triggered significant alarm bells within the cross-chain infrastructure sector. deBridge, one of Flow's key cross-chain bridge providers, recently highlighted a troubling gap in the chain's rollback coordination strategy: critical ecosystem participants including bridges, custodians, and liquidity providers were reportedly left out of advance planning discussions.

**The Communication Breakdown**

While Flow's team suggested that synchronization had been established with key ecosystem partners, deBridge's experience tells a different story. As a major cross-chain bridge serving the Flow network, the protocol received no formal communication or coordination from Flow's development team prior to the rollback announcement. This communication vacuum creates a dangerous scenario where billions in locked assets across different chains could face unprecedented risk exposure during the state transition.

**Hidden Dangers in Rapid State Rollback**

The risks embedded in a hasty rollback extend far beyond recovering from the initial security incident. Cross-chain transactions operate on intricate synchronization mechanisms—rushing a global state rollback could trigger cascading failures. The potential consequences include:

- **Asset Doubling**: Duplicate balance records across chains where transactions were recorded but states weren't synchronized
- **Unrecoverable Assets**: Locked tokens becoming permanently stranded in smart contracts due to mismatched state references
- **Systemic Contagion**: Failures in one bridge could destabilize custodial systems and affect counterparties who operated normally during the affected window

Notably, several large cross-chain transactions—including significant USDC movements coordinated through LayerZero—were already executed during the contested window, making state restoration exponentially more complex.

**Learning From Historical Precedent**

Flow isn't facing an unprecedented crisis. Past incidents, such as the BNB Chain security event, demonstrated that surgical isolation of compromised validators offered a more stable solution than wholesale state reversions. That approach minimized collateral damage to users and infrastructure while containing the actual threat vector.

**A Roadmap for Responsible Recovery**

Rather than proceeding with aggressive execution, deBridge and the broader ecosystem are calling for validators to temporarily halt the rollback validation process until:

- A comprehensive remediation strategy is documented and stress-tested
- Full coordination with all major cross-chain bridges, custodians, and DEX protocols is completed
- Independent security auditors review the rollback execution plan
- Clear communication timelines are established for all ecosystem stakeholders

The current moment demands transparency, methodical coordination, and measured decision-making—not speed at the expense of ecosystem stability. The cost of getting this wrong transcends the original security breach.