The CEO of a leading trading platform recently clarified rumors about the White House changing its legislative stance in the United States. He pointed out that the White House has been quite proactive and constructive in promoting bills related to the crypto market, and has not withdrawn support as widely rumored.
The CEO revealed that the White House had proactively communicated with the platform, hoping to reach a consensus with traditional banking industry, with the goal of ensuring that community banks gain tangible benefits from this bill. This demonstrates a pragmatic attitude from regulators towards the crypto industry.
However, the platform suddenly changed its original stance last week, suspending support for the bill. This shift subsequently sparked industry debates over "banks vs. crypto."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProveMyZK
· 18h ago
This CEO's words sound nice, but the platform backstabs right after—really interesting.
The White House wants to support, but it turns out the community banks are the real parents? I can't understand it.
Suspending support is probably to get higher stakes... it's all the same.
This matter is just ridiculous, one set of words on the left, another on the right.
Banking and crypto cooperation, I think it's doubtful.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 18h ago
The White House is really sticking to the old tricks, just talking nicely.
Speaking of which, how come this platform has betrayed again? Just earlier, they were singing praises.
Can banks and the crypto circle get along? Dream on, friends.
Honestly, it's still a matter of interests; everyone wants a piece of the pie.
This change is happening way too fast. Who's really stabbing from behind?
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 18h ago
The White House is playing tai chi again, saying nice things but where's the real money?
This move is truly outrageous; just said support for a turnaround and now it's paused...
By the way, can community banks really benefit from this? I have my doubts.
No matter how nicely they phrase it, they can't change the fact that regulators love to change their minds.
Why does it always feel like they're just teasing traditional finance?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 19h ago
Coming to clarify again? Feels like playing Tai Chi.
Is the White House really that straightforward...
Suddenly changing tone, there must be some hidden reason.
Can banks and the crypto circle really shake hands? That's hilarious.
This move is definitely a bit flashy.
The CEO of a leading trading platform recently clarified rumors about the White House changing its legislative stance in the United States. He pointed out that the White House has been quite proactive and constructive in promoting bills related to the crypto market, and has not withdrawn support as widely rumored.
The CEO revealed that the White House had proactively communicated with the platform, hoping to reach a consensus with traditional banking industry, with the goal of ensuring that community banks gain tangible benefits from this bill. This demonstrates a pragmatic attitude from regulators towards the crypto industry.
However, the platform suddenly changed its original stance last week, suspending support for the bill. This shift subsequently sparked industry debates over "banks vs. crypto."