Someone has wagered $66.6K on the prediction market, betting that Trump will acquire Greenland before 2027. If it comes true, this bet could yield over $380K in profit. What is the logic behind such a large bet? Is it really based on some insider information, or just pure political speculation? High-odds contracts like this on prediction markets have always been used by investors to hedge geopolitical risks, but such a monetary-level bet definitely sparks the imagination.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SlowLearnerWang
· 01-20 07:01
Whoa, 66.6k crashing into Greenland... Is this guy serious? Or just for fun?
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 01-20 03:40
Can you really gamble on Greenland? Haha, this is truly everything can be played with.
I can't tell if it's insider information or pure gambling, but I missed this wave anyway.
6x leverage just for this? That's pretty bold.
Prediction markets really dare to open any kind of market.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-18 14:29
Hmm, I just want to know who is so wealthy and daring to gamble like this. 66.6k just to chase a Greenland dream... Is this genuine information or just a gambler's mindset?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffet
· 01-17 20:26
66.6k directly go all-in on Greenland... This guy is really daring, betting ten times leverage on a geopolitical mysticism. Why do I feel this isn't hedging but pure gambling?
Insider information? Come on, prediction markets are like this—there's always someone using spare money to bet on the bizarre decisions of the chosen ones.
The odds are indeed tempting, but is the probability high... I'm just tempted.
It's really typical of the US to think of everything.
The number 66.6 is also carefully chosen, what do you think it's implying?
Is it really okay to play such a big game in prediction markets? I still prefer to stay grounded withirdrops and freebies.
Betting itself isn't a problem, but I'm worried it will turn into another round of public opinion battles, and the money won't be made.
If this succeeds, how many people will go crazy, but I bet it won't happen.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMaster
· 01-17 20:26
66.6 this number is so deliberate, obviously someone is joking haha
This guy either really has some insider info or is just a pure gambler, both are possible
Honestly, what's the chance of taking Greenland... but market prediction is like this, the more outrageous the odds, the more people are willing to bet money
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-17 20:22
66.6k invested just to gamble on this? Man, how free are you, or is there some rumor going around?
Someone has wagered $66.6K on the prediction market, betting that Trump will acquire Greenland before 2027. If it comes true, this bet could yield over $380K in profit. What is the logic behind such a large bet? Is it really based on some insider information, or just pure political speculation? High-odds contracts like this on prediction markets have always been used by investors to hedge geopolitical risks, but such a monetary-level bet definitely sparks the imagination.