2026-01-16 21:48:20

The XRPL ecosystem welcomes a new milestone in academic collaboration! Ripple has partnered with UC Berkeley to officially launch the Digital Asset Accelerator project, building a bridge between academic research and industry implementation.

The first pilot results this fall were impressive—participating teams' product maturity increased by 67%, and the funding confidence index soared by 92%. What does this mean? It actually indicates that innovative ideas from universities are being connected with real industry needs, and the incubation results are quite promising.

Through this accelerator, more and more innovative applications built on XRPL will have the opportunity to move from campus to market, truly achieving practical application of academic knowledge.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-6bc33122

· 7h ago

67%？92%？These numbers sound pretty impressive, but I don't know how far they can actually go. Anyway, it's another round of hype. Whether campus projects can really survive is still uncertain; soaring funding confidence doesn't necessarily mean actual money is being raised. A bunch of student projects mostly die in the gap between product and market. Applying what you've learned? Laughable. Most school-developed products end up as cannon fodder in the market. Ripple's move this time is just packaging XRPL to sound more academic. The momentum is strong, but how many can truly be implemented? This kind of collaboration sounds great, but in the end, is it just a bunch of vapor projects? Having many projects is good, but how low can the mortality rate really be? It still depends on subsequent real data.

View OriginalReply0

ContractBugHunter

· 7h ago

67% and 92% are quite impressive figures, but it's indeed rare for campus projects to be successfully implemented. Ripple's move is quite clever, bringing in schools for endorsement. Really? Funding confidence skyrocketed by 92%? Seems exaggerated. With UC Berkeley's support, XRPL finally has a bit of an academic flavor. From campus to market... just listen, most projects still die on the way. This is the right approach; the academic circle can indeed generate good ideas. Feels like a routine, another funding gimmick? The collaboration is good, but worried about follow-up support. The academic world is finally entering Web3.

View OriginalReply0

SybilSlayer

· 7h ago

Hmm... The project conducted by UC Berkeley looks quite good based on the data. But how are the figures of 67% and 92% quantified? Ripple definitely chose the right partners this time; the academic circle really has a lot of creative ideas. Can campus projects really go to market? That depends on whether the team is willing to fight hard enough... Maturity level skyrocketing, funding confidence through the roof, sounds great, but I don't know how the second half of the year will turn out. XRPL ecosystem is about to take off again? I'll hold my opinion for now and see what truly useful applications emerge.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 7h ago

Uh, Ripple's recent move does have some ideas, but to be fair, can that group in academia really produce anything? A product maturity of 67% sounds pretty good, but maybe they can push for another wave. Can the XRPL ecosystem come up with any killer applications from this? I'm still a bit skeptical. Relying solely on funding confidence isn't enough; it depends on how the actual projects that follow through turn out. UC Berkeley's backing definitely adds points, but I wonder how many of these teams will actually survive in the end. Feels like another PR stunt by big companies—pretty data but the actual situation is hard to say. Hey, is this accelerator project about to cut another wave of investors? Truly valuable applications will make their own noise; there's no need to wait for an accelerator. No more words, let's wait and see if there's any standout product by the end of the year.

View OriginalReply0

BackrowObserver

· 8h ago

Damn, UC Berkeley's move is really impressive; a 67% increase in maturity level is no joke. Ripple really wants to establish XRPL as the ecosystem foundation this time. Combining academia and industry, it feels like a few dark horse projects are about to emerge. This data sounds good, but how it actually translates into results still depends. 92% funding confidence index? Who gave that much courage, haha. Is XRPL about to take off, everyone?

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 8h ago

A 67% maturity increase? That number sounds a bit suspicious. How was it calculated? With UC Berkeley's support, XRPL is definitely gaining momentum. Funding confidence skyrocketed by 92%... Just listen, real money is what counts. What good things can come from the collision between academia and the crypto world? Ripple is boosting its visibility, a smart business move. We've heard of many incubation projects, but how many actually succeed in the end? From research papers to products, the pitfalls in between are quite deep.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryer

· 8h ago

This number is indeed quite impressive; a 67% increase in maturity is no joke. Ripple is finally seriously building its ecosystem, much better than some projects. UC Berkeley's endorsement really carries weight... recognition from the academic community is different. Funding confidence has soared by 92%, indicating that investors are still on board, but it depends on what comes out next. Applying what you've learned sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT project; we need to see actual implementation. This is the right approach to ecosystem development, not just empty talk. That 92% figure might be a bit exaggerated; could there be a problem with the statistics... or are we overthinking it? How many projects can truly step out of the campus? At least the direction is correct.

View OriginalReply0