Fluent's NFT sale progress is quite interesting. Only about 10 NFTs were minted in the past 4 hours, and the enthusiasm has clearly declined.
The underlying logic might be this: at the last minute, the tiered mechanism was adjusted so that T2/T3/T4 enjoy the same price, and market participants' mindset changed. Investors who might have been eager to buy earlier are now choosing to wait and see — since the prices are unified, there's no need to rush.
This kind of market reaction is quite common. Temporary changes in pricing strategy can easily disrupt expectations, causing investors to reassess cost and benefits. The upcoming data will be very telling—whether this is just a short-term cool-down or if it truly kills the enthusiasm.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedTwice
· 16h ago
This move is really brilliant, directly killing FOMO.
When prices are unified, no one will compete anymore. I truly respect this logic.
It's another project that self-destructed; change the layering mechanism and the hype is gone.
Waiting to see the follow-up data, feels quite cold.
Serves them right, they can change the pricing temporarily, trust level drops to zero.
Ten NFTs in 4 hours, this level of coldness is a bit outrageous.
When not competing on price, no one wants it anymore. This is the market.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 16h ago
Damn, the operation of changing the price temporarily is really brilliant, it directly kills FOMO
The prices are unified, but no one is in a rush? This psychology is a bit ruthless
10 NFTs in 4 hours, how awkward is that...
This wave of price adjustment is like stabbing oneself
Waiting to see the subsequent data, feeling like it's going to cool off
The investors who were rushing to get on board now are all just watching the show, huh
Changing the mechanism = changing expectations, now the players' mentality has completely changed
A bit curious to see how this project will crash...
The prices are the same, but the heat has dropped, how ironic
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 01-16 22:12
Wow, changing the price at the last minute is really genius, totally caught people off guard.
Wait, T4 can also be at the same price? Then what's the value of the early bird I grabbed after staying up all night?
This is what happens when the investors shoot themselves in the foot; they can't control the rhythm.
Ten NFTs in four hours? Feels even worse than that one project last time.
What happened to the promised scarcity? After changing the rules, no one wants it anymore?
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 01-16 22:10
A classic case of shooting oneself in the foot, losing the game the moment you change the rules.
---
Wait, does this move really scare away all the rush orders? The price stays the same but no one wants it anymore—ironic.
---
That's why you shouldn't change the rules at the last minute; once confidence is destroyed, it can't be regained.
---
10 NFTs in 4 hours... this hype is really gone. Changing the pricing mechanism can kill a project—lesson learned.
---
So what are they betting on now? Or are they just giving up directly?
---
Those who rushed to get on earlier are now just watching the show. This move has completely broken their momentum.
---
Why do project teams always insist on changing the rules at the last minute? Don't they know this is the most disliked by the market?
---
Uniform pricing actually cooled things down? It shows that it was just hype marketing holding things up, with no real demand.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 01-16 22:07
Haha, temporarily changing the price is really clever—shooting yourself in the foot.
What happened to the promised scarcity? Once the price is unified, investors' minds clear up.
This round might really be over—it's not calmness, but no one wants it anymore.
Let's wait and see the follow-up data to prove us wrong.
A typical case of operational suicide; sticking to the original plan might have been better.
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 01-16 22:04
A typical case of shooting oneself in the foot... Changing the rules on the fly really easily leads to failure.
---
Price uniformity actually reduces urgency; I understand this logic.
---
Another case where "optimization mechanisms" backfire and create a dull atmosphere.
---
Let's wait and see if the upcoming data can save the situation... Feeling uncertain.
---
At the same price, the sense of scarcity is lost; no wonder no one is rushing.
---
Changing strategies resulted in a reverse effect haha.
---
This is what you call "biting off more than you can chew" or "biting the hand that feeds you."
---
Short-term calm? I think it's more like it's cooled off completely...
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 01-16 21:56
According to research, this is a typical case of price discrimination strategy failure. The moment the tiered mechanism was temporarily removed, the entire incentive structure collapsed.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 01-16 21:47
This move is truly funny; changing the rules on the spot just killed the hype.
The price stayed the same, and now no one is rushing in—human nature.
The biggest regret is for those who paid high prices immediately.
It's another case of shooting oneself in the foot.
Fluent really failed in social engagement this time.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 01-16 21:43
Prices are all aligned, but no one wants it. This move is quite interesting. Feels like shooting oneself in the foot.
---
Same old story, changing rules at the last minute easily angers people. Investors were originally waiting for that sense of "scarcity."
---
10 in 4 hours? The minting speed has been cut in half. Now the spectators should take this seriously.
---
Basically, they've cut the incentives for early participants. Who's in a hurry now? Anyway, it's all at the same price.
---
There are quite a few cases where "fairness" ends up killing its own momentum. The market isn't that simple.
---
Waiting to see what happens next. It seems this wave of popularity might really be over.
---
Reasonable pricing but losing that bit of "irrational" driving force—it's a contradiction.
---
Sudden uniform pricing? Might as well not release at all, since it can't stimulate demand anymore.
Fluent's NFT sale progress is quite interesting. Only about 10 NFTs were minted in the past 4 hours, and the enthusiasm has clearly declined.
The underlying logic might be this: at the last minute, the tiered mechanism was adjusted so that T2/T3/T4 enjoy the same price, and market participants' mindset changed. Investors who might have been eager to buy earlier are now choosing to wait and see — since the prices are unified, there's no need to rush.
This kind of market reaction is quite common. Temporary changes in pricing strategy can easily disrupt expectations, causing investors to reassess cost and benefits. The upcoming data will be very telling—whether this is just a short-term cool-down or if it truly kills the enthusiasm.