2026-01-16 14:26:47

Some traders' consistent profitability is indeed impressive, and behind a stable profit curve, there is usually a systematic methodology support.

Someone shared a trading framework like this: carefully select 10 markets that are believed to have balanced win rates as the main battlegrounds, and use continuous order placement to provide liquidity for entry. By constantly buying to balance prices and odds, while accumulating platform points to generate additional income. This way, they participate in liquidity mining and profit through price differences—killing two birds with one stone.

Ultimately, the core logic of this method is to bet with a plan. Behind seemingly simple configurations, it tests deep thinking about market selection, risk balancing, and capital management. Limiting to 10 markets can effectively reduce the tracking costs caused by over-diversification, and the 50/50 allocation setting maintains enough flexibility.

The key is to find markets you believe in and then stick to executing them.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MerkleDreamer

· 20h ago

Are 10 markets really enough? It still feels like it's easy to bet on failures. --- In simple terms, it's about selecting the right tracks and sticking to them, the key is whether you can endure the drawdown. --- Liquidity mining + arbitrage dual income, sounds great but requires a lot of toughness to execute. --- The 50/50 allocation ratio is a bit particular; not many people can truly stick to it. --- Finding a market you believe in is simple; persistence in execution is the real challenge. --- This methodology sounds good, but it seems most people get stuck at the market selection step. --- Is there such a big difference between betting with a plan and betting without one? --- There are no shortcuts to stable returns; it's all about the details of fund management. --- Setting the cap at 10 markets is clever; it’s just the right threshold to avoid overload in tracking. --- Risk balancing sounds easy, but very few can truly achieve it.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 20h ago

Oh no, I need to try the 50/50 configuration in 10 markets. I always feel like I'm firing randomly like a scattergun. Sticking to the plan is the hardest part. I have a fickle personality, changing with the wind, it's tough. Rebuilding my mindset... This time I must follow the system, or I'll be taught a lesson by the market again. Liquidity mining + arbitrage, sounds good but can it really be stable? It still depends on which market you choose. Having gone through so many cycles, my biggest fear now is blind confidence. Take it slow.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 20h ago

It sounds like splitting eggs into 10 baskets, and having a steady mindset is half the battle. --- The 50/50 allocation setup is interesting, but the real challenge is the "careful screening" at the beginning. --- It's about liquidity mining and arbitrage again, sounds too good to be true... --- The key phrase is still—坚持执行 (stick to the plan). It's easy to say, but hard to actually do. --- I agree that not over-diversifying into 10 markets, but the problem is most people struggle to find even one market they trust. --- Two birds with one stone, right? But I always feel like this is a one-eagle-three-sparrows rhythm. --- The allocation methodology sounds professional, but the essence of gambling can't escape.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 20h ago

nah, this "systematic approach" is just fancy risk laundering... 10 markets, 50/50 splits, liquidity mining stacking—it's governance theater dressed up as strategy. the real exploit? most traders don't understand their own capital allocation is literally a voting mechanism on protocol efficiency. they're just executing without seeing the systemic vulnerability they're creating.

Reply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 20h ago

It sounds like the old routine of stable arbitrage, but discipline is key. Limiting to 10 markets is smart, so you don't fall behind. This methodology sounds simple, but in practice, it's hell. Planned betting? Basically a game of probability. Liquidity mining + price difference, there's definitely something there. Sticking to execution is more difficult than choosing markets, I think.

View OriginalReply0