【Crypto World】I read an interesting economic analysis report. Payden & Rygel economist Jeffrey Cleveland offered a different perspective — the large AI-related expenditures are mainly supported by corporate cash flows rather than excessive borrowing.
What does this mean? Debt growth is relatively moderate. He specifically mentioned that although corporate leverage ratios are common warning signs before an economic downturn, current data is far from the level of overexpansion that has frequently occurred in history.
So is the AI bubble really that big? Cleveland’s conclusion is: unlikely. A more sobering point is — “The real risk investors face now may not be entering too late, but exiting too early.”
In other words, if you exit because you're afraid of a bubble, you might regret it. Of course, all investments carry risks; this is just an observation from a macroeconomic data perspective.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RatioHunter
· 7h ago
Leaving too early is the real risk, that hits home.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 7h ago
Leaving too early? That sounds really harsh, feels like you're talking about me.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 7h ago
The idea of leaving too early sounds a bit harsh... but we need to see if this guy has any vested interests.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 7h ago
Leaving too early is the real trap, that hits home.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 7h ago
Leaving too early is the real killer; this statement truly hits home.
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 8h ago
Leaving too early is really heartbreaking; this wave is a bit different.
Will the AI boom turn into a bubble? Economists: The risk may not be in entering the market, but in exiting too early
【Crypto World】I read an interesting economic analysis report. Payden & Rygel economist Jeffrey Cleveland offered a different perspective — the large AI-related expenditures are mainly supported by corporate cash flows rather than excessive borrowing.
What does this mean? Debt growth is relatively moderate. He specifically mentioned that although corporate leverage ratios are common warning signs before an economic downturn, current data is far from the level of overexpansion that has frequently occurred in history.
So is the AI bubble really that big? Cleveland’s conclusion is: unlikely. A more sobering point is — “The real risk investors face now may not be entering too late, but exiting too early.”
In other words, if you exit because you're afraid of a bubble, you might regret it. Of course, all investments carry risks; this is just an observation from a macroeconomic data perspective.