2026-01-16 08:38:41

Twitter policy adjustments continue to impact the Infodfi ecosystem. According to industry sources, recent platform policy updates have affected the operational strategies of several popular crypto projects, including Kaito, CookieDAO, Wallchain Quacks, ProtoKOLs, Zentry, Arbus, FiveRep, Ethos, Mirra, and Fantasy Top, among more than ten projects currently evaluating response plans. This round of policy changes has forced some Infodfi projects to reassess their marketing channels and community operation models, with some considering shifting to other platforms or adjusting their product positioning. Industry insiders believe that although such policy fluctuations may pose short-term challenges for projects, they also encourage ecosystem participants to focus more on compliant operations and long-term value creation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiOldTrickster

· 01-19 01:49

Haha, another wave of policy crackdown? It was long overdue. These projects rely on hype to harvest retail investors every day. Now they should be feeling the pain. Twitter throttling to enforce compliance is actually the right way to survive in a bear market. Infodfi is a chaotic scene in the short term, but in the long run, the opportunities become clearer. The real annualized return opportunities lie in the process of survival of the fittest. People aren't dead yet, don't rush to sing the dirge. I actually believe that the remaining projects after this reshuffle are promising. Policy fluctuations are arbitrage opportunities. As long as you dare to place orders when others are panicking, once your reinvestment strategy is executed, the returns will rise. You can survive in a bear market, provided you have a brain—not blindly following the trend and going all-in.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-17 12:57

Oh no, here we go again... When Twitter makes a move, the entire ecosystem trembles Compliance, compliance, we're all tired of hearing it, but the key question is who is actually doing it? These projects should have moved elsewhere long ago; they've been held back for too long This wave of Infodfi feels a bit risky, with over a dozen projects acting simultaneously... But on the other hand, eliminating non-compliant projects might not be a bad thing? Twitter's move is quite aggressive, and there are probably more to come

View OriginalReply0

HalfIsEmpty

· 01-16 09:08

Here we go again, this time it's InfoDeFi's turn. LOL Changing Twitter policies is like changing the boss; project teams have to relearn the rules every time. Compliance? Don't make me laugh. It's good enough that the ecosystem is still alive. Now it's better, Zentry and others need to find a new partner quickly, or there's really nowhere to promote. Volatility? Isn't this just the usual script? Hang in there, and you'll win.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocity

· 01-16 09:08

Oh, causing trouble again. This time Twitter swinging the big sword really hurts. This move by Twitter, those who have switched to Telegram have already done so. Over a dozen projects panicking together, this is the true "Twitter effect" oh boy. Compliance operation sounds good, but honestly, who would really stick to this path? Infodfi's chessboard is being reset again, interesting. Hopefully, this crackdown can clear out all the fishy projects, but the chances seem slim. After all the back and forth, as always, whenever there's a little movement in the crypto world, everyone starts self-rescue mode. What is ProtoKOLs' response? Have you heard if they've made any adjustments? Short-term pain, long-term gains—it's a nice saying, but few will survive until then.

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBlindCat

· 01-16 08:46

Is it policy crackdown again? Now many projects have to scramble With a move on Twitter, the entire ecosystem has to relocate, where is the promised decentralization? Compliance, compliance, everyone’s tired of hearing it, but we still have to survive Infodfi projects are really unlucky, just getting started and now this But on the other hand, eliminating some weak projects isn’t a bad thing Feels like someone will be running to Discord and Telegram again, history repeating Over a dozen projects panicking at the same time, this is true systemic risk It’s high time to change the approach; over-reliance on a single platform has led to this outcome

View OriginalReply0