Currently, many project teams' token issuance plans are beginning to cause dissatisfaction within the community. An increasing number of token holders are choosing not to claim, followed by wave after wave of criticism. The root of the problem still lies in the project management's execution approach—some decisions are indeed hard to accept. Looking at the previous cases where the community dissed due to mishandling, the logic is actually quite similar. If these situations continue, they will only make the problems more disgusting, and eventually, the entire project's reputation will be completely ruined.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 01-19 06:06
Bro, are you using this trick again? The management just won't learn, keep on shooting themselves in the foot
---
Not claiming is the right move. Why keep these project teams around?
---
Watching these projects destroy themselves one by one, honestly, it's a bit exhausting
---
If reputation is ruined, then it's ruined. Those who should wake up have already left
---
It's always the same routine. Do you really believe they'll change?
---
The community's patience has its limits. It’s probably about to run out now
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 01-18 18:10
It's the same old trick... management just doesn't understand what incentive balance means, and they keep pushing players away.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 01-18 08:51
Really incredible, the project team is just asking for trouble.
---
Not claiming it is fine, anyway it’s of no use.
---
Same old trick? Switching aliases to keep scamming?
---
Where is the management’s brain? Can’t even figure this out.
---
Their reputation is ruined, serves them right. Who to blame?
---
Just looking at it makes me angry, they have to make things like this.
---
Holders fleeing is probably the smartest choice.
---
Always like this, I really have nothing to say.
---
These people should go bankrupt.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 01-17 14:37
Another project team messing up, really need to wake up
---
Not claiming it is fine, anyway these projects will eventually fade away
---
Did management lose their minds? You can tell they haven't thought through the consequences of this decision
---
I'm tired of this pattern, one after another, so annoying
---
I don't care if the reputation is ruined or not, mainly I want to know if my coins can still go up
---
It's always like this, claiming to improve but just playing the same old tricks
---
The community is dissing to this extent and there's no response, this project is truly hopeless
---
Didn't those previous cases teach any lessons? I just can't understand
---
Such poor execution, no wonder people are leaving
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 01-16 08:42
Here we go again, has the management gone crazy?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 01-16 08:39
What is this, starting to act up again
---
The project team is really good at causing trouble, ruining good cards
---
Those who haven't claimed are all sober now, this wave is really outrageous
---
Honestly, it's still the management's fault—too young, too simple, decisions made on a whim
---
I've seen too many of these crash cases, the tricks are all the same
---
Reputation, once destroyed, can be gone in an instant
---
All the holders have run away, what else is there to say? This time it's really over
---
I just want to ask, why do they have to do it this way
---
Another project about to over, betting on a pack of spicy strips
---
Poor handling? This is obviously unprofessional
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 01-16 08:34
It was about time someone said it, does management really want to commit suicide?
---
Same old story, the project team will never learn
---
Just don't claim it, vote with your wallet
---
I really can't take it anymore, why is it always the same operation?
---
Who gave them the courage to do this...
---
Once reputation is ruined, it's very hard to recover. It looks pretty upsetting
---
This time they'll probably be dissed to the end, they brought it on themselves
---
Holders have all left the project, what else do they want?
---
Always the same every time, really need to reflect
---
Brothers, just abandon it directly, why wait?
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 01-16 08:19
Is this just the same old trick again? Are the management really living in their own world?
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAll
· 01-16 08:19
Coming back with this again? The management team really should reflect on this.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 01-16 08:15
Is this the same old story again? The management really needs to wake up.
Not claiming is the harshest form of voting, much more effective than cursing.
Who’s trying to die this time? Always the same routine.
Project team: We value feedback. Community: Haha.
Reputation can be destroyed very quickly, haha.
Really, with such a small mindset, what Web3 are you even doing?
Coming again and again? Can't learn?
Getting called out so quickly?
I just want to see how the follow-up turns the tide... probably can't turn it around.
Management is a bit... do they understand?
The number of people not claiming can say everything; data will speak.
Are they trying to turn everyone against them?
Currently, many project teams' token issuance plans are beginning to cause dissatisfaction within the community. An increasing number of token holders are choosing not to claim, followed by wave after wave of criticism. The root of the problem still lies in the project management's execution approach—some decisions are indeed hard to accept. Looking at the previous cases where the community dissed due to mishandling, the logic is actually quite similar. If these situations continue, they will only make the problems more disgusting, and eventually, the entire project's reputation will be completely ruined.