A major U.S. banking executive recently floated an intriguing figure: roughly $6 trillion could potentially flow out of the traditional banking system into stablecoins—but there's a crucial catch. The shift would only materialize if regulators greenlight interest-bearing stablecoins. Right now, most stablecoins sit idle as store-of-value instruments. Once they earn yield, the calculus changes dramatically. That $6T figure isn't pulled from thin air—it represents the scale of deposits that might find stablecoins more attractive than conventional bank accounts, especially if the rate environment shifts. The takeaway: permitting yield-bearing stablecoins could fundamentally reshape capital flows between traditional finance and on-chain settlement layers. It's a reminder that mainstream adoption hinges as much on policy frameworks as on technology itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EthSandwichHero
· 01-18 19:30
6 trillion? Nice words, but it's all about the regulatory stance. You can only move with yield; without yield, it's just a decoration. I've seen through this trick a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-18 08:14
60 trillion sounds impressive, but the key is still waiting for regulatory approval
---
Once stablecoins are approved, traditional banks will be directly breached
---
Basically, everything depends on policy; technology is just a minor detail
---
This time, it's really about who can first block the regulatory card
---
Stablecoins earning interest while lying down? Dream on, how could regulators possibly allow that
---
Before 6T flows out, three hurdles must be cleared; currently, not even the first hurdle has been passed
---
Interesting, even bank executives are admitting the threat of stablecoins
---
Add interest, and depositing in traditional banks seems foolish
---
The core issue is permitting; who knows when the policy window will open
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-15 19:56
60 trillion? Ha, if this number really materializes, traditional banks would be crying their eyes out, but the policy hurdle is probably going to be tough.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-15 19:53
60 trillion sounds nice, but the key is for regulators to speak up; otherwise, stablecoins will just lie flat.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 01-15 19:49
6 trillion sounds crazy, but honestly, it's just a matter of regulation giving the nod...
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 01-15 19:43
Six trillion is just a nice number to say; the key is whether the regulatory authorities approve it. Who would want a stablecoin with no returns?
A major U.S. banking executive recently floated an intriguing figure: roughly $6 trillion could potentially flow out of the traditional banking system into stablecoins—but there's a crucial catch. The shift would only materialize if regulators greenlight interest-bearing stablecoins. Right now, most stablecoins sit idle as store-of-value instruments. Once they earn yield, the calculus changes dramatically. That $6T figure isn't pulled from thin air—it represents the scale of deposits that might find stablecoins more attractive than conventional bank accounts, especially if the rate environment shifts. The takeaway: permitting yield-bearing stablecoins could fundamentally reshape capital flows between traditional finance and on-chain settlement layers. It's a reminder that mainstream adoption hinges as much on policy frameworks as on technology itself.