2026-01-15 16:39:29

A consensus is gradually forming in the community: a large amount of AI-generated content flooding the timeline has indeed lowered the quality of information.

Some point out that certain content creators' AI-generated texts are polluting the discussion space every day, which is also why the community's evaluation of them is not high. Everyone is more eager for genuine exchange of viewpoints and discussions with depth of thought, rather than machine-generated informational noise.

The narrative logic of Infofi also seems to be reaching its end. This may mean that the entire industry needs to re-examine the direction of content production—prioritizing quality or traffic. The community has already voted with its attitude.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RooftopVIP

· 4h ago

The rooftops are all full, and you're still water AI articles? I'm truly impressed.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 4h ago

Really, can the AI spam that floods the screen every day just stop? It's so annoying. --- Someone should have said this earlier: quality > traffic. It's good that the community remembers this. --- That set of Infofi is truly disgusting. Who still believes in it now? --- No more pretending. I just hate those accounts that post daily AI-generated articles. So annoying. --- The voting results are very clear. It's time for this industry to undergo a reshuffle. --- Interestingly, some people still insist on producing garbage content. Are they really not afraid?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainArchaeologist

· 4h ago

Really, after browsing around, it's all AI garbage, it's overwhelming... It should have been regulated earlier. If this continues, who will still want to have serious discussions? Quality > traffic. The community is already voting with their feet. It's time to wake up. It seems many people are just relying on piling up AI content to scam for popularity. No wonder the reputation is collapsing. The Infofi approach is indeed becoming outdated. It's time for those with ideas to step up.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 4h ago

I've been annoyed for a long time. The timeline every day is full of this kind of AI garbage content. Do you really think we're blind? Honestly, those creators who rely on piling up views to attract attention will eventually fade away. Rather than saying community voting, it's more like natural selection—an inverse of the survival of the fittest, where bad money drives out good. The phrase "quality is king" has been said for so many years, and we still have to repeatedly educate newcomers. The Infofi approach is long outdated; it looks awkward. Human touch can never be replaced. This time, the community finally woke up. They're starting this again—traffic maniacs will never die out. Machine-generated text is too easy to recognize. Who are they fooling? They really think people are fools.

View OriginalReply0

LightningHarvester