2026-01-15 08:27:59

The regulatory landscape for stablecoins remains fragmented and unnecessarily complex, according to industry observers. Rather than a unified framework, regulators across different jurisdictions have created patchwork solutions that complicate adoption and compliance.

This fragmentation creates real friction. Projects supporting major stablecoins like USDC and USDT face inconsistent requirements depending on where they operate. Meanwhile, newer projects like RLUSD navigate an unclear path through overlapping regulatory expectations.

What's the disconnect? Simple: policymakers haven't aligned on a cohesive approach. Some favor strict banking-like regulations, others prefer lighter oversight. The result? Platforms must essentially operate multiple compliance playbooks simultaneously.

For the broader ecosystem to mature, harmonization is critical. Whether through intergovernmental coordination or mutual recognition agreements, the industry needs clearer, more uniform standards. Until then, stablecoin regulation will remain a significant operational burden rather than a level playing field.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RunWithRugs

· 01-18 01:15

This regulatory chaos is really funny. A coin that is compliant in the US has to start from scratch in Europe again. Regulatory standards vary wildly across different regions, and project teams are like whack-a-mole. Basically, it's just politicians in different countries refusing to recognize each other, which is the real fragmentation. When will they be able to coordinate and unify? It feels like a distant dream. Instead of waiting for the bureaucratic system to straighten itself out, it's better to see who can break through the deadlock first. This kind of chaos is a deadly barrier for small projects.

View OriginalReply0

ProtocolRebel

· 01-17 23:09

Regulation is just a bunch of bickering, with each country doing its own thing. Project teams are caught in the middle and exhausted... Honestly, USDC and USDT have to comply with multiple sets of rules, and new projects are even more confused. If you ask me, it's because policymakers haven't figured it out yet—one side wants the banking system's approach, while the other just wants to lie flat, making everyone uncomfortable. There needs to be a unified standard, or this work will never end. How much longer can this industry last...

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 01-17 04:19

This regulatory fragmentation is really eating people... Each region has its own set of rules, and project teams have to split into multiple compliant versions to move forward. For stablecoins to truly take off, we need to first gather these old-fashioned policy officials for a meeting. It's the same old problem of "each doing their own thing." When will there be a unified standard? Honestly, the authorities haven't figured out how to regulate stablecoins yet, so they keep throwing punches randomly. Both USDC and USDT have to adapt everywhere, and new projects have it even worse... It seems like the ecosystem will need a few more years of tinkering before it matures. Why can't we learn from internet protocols? A unified standard is so simple. Policy synchronization is much more difficult than technology, to be honest.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_Liquidated

· 01-15 08:53

Oh no, each regulator doing their own thing is really incredible. The compliance costs are forcing projects to die a slow death. --- It's the same old tired argument again—waiting for coordination? Probably waiting until the next bull market for that to happen. --- Basically, every country wants to make money but avoid responsibility. Stablecoins are the most vulnerable. --- USDC, USDT, these big players can't even handle it, let alone new projects. Just advise them to give up. --- Running multiple compliance systems at the same time? The costs are enough to make some small projects give up. --- Want a unified framework? Uh... first, regulatory agencies in each country should put their own agendas aside. --- It's really just about "harmonization" for the sake of "harmonization." Nothing has actually changed—just talk. --- I think, instead of waiting for a settlement, it's better to go directly to jurisdictions that are friendly to you. You can decide whether it's worth the effort.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-15 08:48

Regulatory authorities really can't get a handle on it, each acting independently, leaving project teams overwhelmed. When will this situation be sorted out? It feels like we have to wait many more years. Stablecoins are being repeatedly messed with, and the space for innovation is getting smaller and smaller. Regulators really should sit down and have a proper talk; don't let this system break us. Honestly, it's still a matter of inconsistent policies; small coins simply can't survive. USDC and USDT have to run through multiple systems, and new projects are even more difficult to handle. Who can withstand this?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-ccc36bc5

· 01-15 08:44

Regulatory fragmentation is really a disaster. Countries are acting independently, and project teams work tirelessly to make changes but still can't get approval. Instead of just shouting slogans, it's better to unify standards directly; otherwise, stablecoins will never develop properly.

View OriginalReply0

staking_gramps

· 01-15 08:32

Regulatory agencies each doing their own thing is really incredible. USDC follows one set of rules in Europe and another in the US, making compliance costs directly explode.

View OriginalReply0