2026-01-15 00:24:07

The timeline turned out more extended than anticipated. Looking back, most people didn't fully grasp how quickly reality simulators would start converging toward mainstream adoption. The technology's trajectory and its intersection with existing infrastructure happened differently than the early expectations suggested—seems like these complex implementations require more time than initial forecasts predicted.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-1a2ed0b9

· 5h ago

It's been a long wait. No one expected that reality simulator would be so difficult to implement, with infrastructure integration bottlenecking progress, and this is how it turned out.

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 5h ago

I should have known earlier, this kind of thing has never followed a schedule. What reality simulator, claiming to be so amazing... is actually just another overhyped concept, and it's still like this now.

View OriginalReply0

TokenStorm

· 5h ago

I've long seen through it; the backtesting data for the Reality Simulator set of tools can't support those crazy launch expectations at all. On-chain data shows that the adoption rate growth isn't that exaggerated, but I still went all-in in the eye of the storm... FOMO really is harmful.

View OriginalReply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 5h ago

It should have been said earlier, prophets always think about overnight success, but little do they know that real tech revolutions are forged in boring infrastructure...

View OriginalReply0