Perfect timing to rebuild my orchestration layer. We're talking about constructing a robust infrastructure foundation here—the kind that handles MCP server coordination effectively.
Rolling out fresh best practices for cross-server communication and workflow management. The approach? Keep it minimal, eliminate unnecessary friction. Let systems flow naturally rather than forcing rigid controls—that's the underlying philosophy.
When you build infrastructure that actually scales, you remove obstacles instead of adding complexity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSquirter
· 5h ago
Haha, this is what I want. Minimalist infrastructure is truly the best.
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictim
· 5h ago
The infrastructure really needs to be properly streamlined; the old rigid processes should be cut.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 5h ago
This guy is talking about leveling out the useless stuff and letting the system run on its own... I like this vibe.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatcher
· 5h ago
Well, in terms of architecture restructuring, the decentralized approach indeed feels much better.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 5h ago
Oops, he's back to messing with infrastructure again. This guy really can't sit still.
Perfect timing to rebuild my orchestration layer. We're talking about constructing a robust infrastructure foundation here—the kind that handles MCP server coordination effectively.
Rolling out fresh best practices for cross-server communication and workflow management. The approach? Keep it minimal, eliminate unnecessary friction. Let systems flow naturally rather than forcing rigid controls—that's the underlying philosophy.
When you build infrastructure that actually scales, you remove obstacles instead of adding complexity.