Does storing each KV pair make sense? Especially when the model only queries a small portion of them in practice.



The idea behind KVzap is straightforward—by learning to identify which cache entries are unlikely to be used in subsequent queries and proactively deleting them. The result is that the cache size can be compressed to 1/2 to 1/4 of the original, with almost no impact on performance.

This intelligent, dynamic dependency-based KV cache pruning method has practical significance for improving model inference efficiency and reducing storage costs. Especially in large-scale deployment scenarios, the potential for optimization is quite substantial.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DogeBachelorvip
· 7h ago
Isn't this just messing around? The previous KV caching strategies were really a waste... Compressing to a quarter and still running, not bad.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperervip
· 7h ago
Haha, isn't this the old problem of wasting storage space finally being properly solved? The KVzap approach is really refreshing.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOopsvip
· 7h ago
This is a truly pragmatic optimization approach, not just optimizing for the sake of optimization. Reducing the compression ratio from 1/2 to 1/4 directly cuts costs.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)