We decided to lead this round for a few key reasons. First, the team's approach to handling quantum risks caught our attention—not something most projects prioritize right now, but it's becoming increasingly critical as tech evolves.
Quantum computing represents a real threat down the line for encryption systems that power blockchain infrastructure today. The fact that these builders are already thinking about post-quantum cryptography? That's the kind of forward-thinking we want to see more of.
Beyond the tech, the fundamentals of the project aligned with our thesis. Strong execution, clear roadmap, and a genuine commitment to long-term security over hype cycles. That's rare enough to warrant serious conviction.
We're excited to see how this plays out.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainFries
· 11h ago
Wow, finally a project is seriously working on quantum resistance, most are just hyping the concept.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 11h ago
Quantum computing risks... Data shows that this thing still needs 5-10 years to become a real threat. Most of the projects currently being promoted are somewhat promising, but their execution is a complete mess.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 11h ago
Quantum cryptography is really rare; most projects are still just hyping concepts. This team has a pretty far-reaching vision.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 11h ago
Post-quantum cryptography is indeed a rare topic; most projects are still focused on increasing TVL. This guy, on the other hand, is calculating the 20-year outlook. From a data perspective, he genuinely has some insights.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamer
· 12h ago
Haha, about quantum computing, no one cared three years ago, and now they're just starting to think about defense. You really need to get your priorities straight.
Backing the P11 round: Here's what we're thinking
We decided to lead this round for a few key reasons. First, the team's approach to handling quantum risks caught our attention—not something most projects prioritize right now, but it's becoming increasingly critical as tech evolves.
Quantum computing represents a real threat down the line for encryption systems that power blockchain infrastructure today. The fact that these builders are already thinking about post-quantum cryptography? That's the kind of forward-thinking we want to see more of.
Beyond the tech, the fundamentals of the project aligned with our thesis. Strong execution, clear roadmap, and a genuine commitment to long-term security over hype cycles. That's rare enough to warrant serious conviction.
We're excited to see how this plays out.