After the incident on November 3rd, we gained new insights into the security strategy of Balancer V3. We cannot only focus on known threats; we need to look further ahead.
What is the current approach? Mainly two aspects. One is to anticipate attack vectors that may only surface in the next few years and to proactively deploy defenses. The other is to implement concrete actions—strengthening the security defenses (such as introducing more risk mitigation mechanisms) and simultaneously patching existing vulnerabilities.
In simple terms, this is a shift from reactive response to proactive evolution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlphaBrain
· 9h ago
Another after-the-fact security update, that wave in November really scared so many people.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 9h ago
After that thing in November, I finally learned to be smart. But on the other hand, only this kind of pain can truly help the project grow.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 9h ago
Starting to hype it up again, this time it's "attacks in the next few years"? Bro, current vulnerabilities can't even be patched up properly.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 9h ago
Honestly, this time we finally learned our lesson. Fixing vulnerabilities alone is useless without preemptive measures.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 9h ago
To be honest, if you only realize after the November wave, it's a bit late... But at least I've figured it out; proactive defense is indeed much smarter than firefighting.
After the incident on November 3rd, we gained new insights into the security strategy of Balancer V3. We cannot only focus on known threats; we need to look further ahead.
What is the current approach? Mainly two aspects. One is to anticipate attack vectors that may only surface in the next few years and to proactively deploy defenses. The other is to implement concrete actions—strengthening the security defenses (such as introducing more risk mitigation mechanisms) and simultaneously patching existing vulnerabilities.
In simple terms, this is a shift from reactive response to proactive evolution.