Here's an interesting take: throughout most of history, the world actually thrived without independent central banks. Look at the numbers - post-WW2 era shows solid growth paired with manageable inflation. Yet nowadays? The picture's quite different. It raises a genuine question about whether central bank independence truly delivers what it promises, or if we've been chasing the wrong playbook for decades. Worth considering when you're thinking about long-term economic cycles and how they shape asset markets.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StrawberryIcevip
· 7h ago
This logic has some issues. Which country after WW2 wasn't stabilized by the independence of its central bank...
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 7h ago
ngl, this historical narrative is a bit selective, the post-WW2 period really wasn't that perfect...
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 7h ago
nah this is actually the weak signal everyone keeps missing... central banks are just paper hands on steroids at this point lol
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)