Stablecoins are evolving into the core support of financial infrastructure. Currently, various public blockchains are competing for market share, but those that can truly break through will be the ones that optimize simultaneously in throughput, transaction costs, and regulatory compliance. This not only relates to user experience but also to whether they can be accepted by mainstream financial institutions. From this perspective, Aptos's design approach indeed aligns with such future demands—by leveraging the security of the Move language and the efficiency of the Aptos consensus mechanism, aiming to create an ecosystem capable of handling large-scale transactions while meeting compliance requirements. In other words, whoever can find a balance between performance, cost, and regulation will hold the discourse power in the next wave of Web3 infrastructure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FalseProfitProphet
· 6h ago
The phrase "stablecoin infrastructure" has been heard too many times, but the key still depends on who can truly implement it. Don't just boast about how secure the Move language is; how is the Aptos ecosystem doing now? Honestly, it still comes down to people actually using it.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 6h ago
Performance, cost, compliance—easy to say, but actually achieving any of them is a nightmare.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 6h ago
To be honest, Aptos sounds good, but whether it can survive really depends on who can first clear the compliance hurdle.
Relying solely on technical indicators is useless; mainstream institutions are most afraid of regulatory risks.
Solana also claims to be high-performance, but what happened? It still faced restrictions.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSister
· 6h ago
Uh... sounds nice, but can Aptos really do it? Feels like every chain is hyping itself up this way
---
Stablecoin core support? Then why didn't anyone step in with their stablecoins during FTX?
---
Performance, cost, compliance—three points in a straight line... Dream on? Give me a break
---
Regulation is really the issue here. Aptos wants to compromise but the US side isn't giving face
---
High throughput, low cost, and compliance? Choosing two is already hard enough, stop the nonsense
---
Aptos is possible, but still far behind Ethereum. Don't hype it up so much
---
The Move language is quite secure, but the ecosystem is too cold. Who the hell would develop there?
---
Voice? Haha, Bitcoin still rules, okay?
---
This article looks like an Aptos PR release... too much commercial flavor
---
Chains that are compliant tend to have the most restrictions. Where is true freedom? Web3 still needs to be decentralized
Stablecoins are evolving into the core support of financial infrastructure. Currently, various public blockchains are competing for market share, but those that can truly break through will be the ones that optimize simultaneously in throughput, transaction costs, and regulatory compliance. This not only relates to user experience but also to whether they can be accepted by mainstream financial institutions. From this perspective, Aptos's design approach indeed aligns with such future demands—by leveraging the security of the Move language and the efficiency of the Aptos consensus mechanism, aiming to create an ecosystem capable of handling large-scale transactions while meeting compliance requirements. In other words, whoever can find a balance between performance, cost, and regulation will hold the discourse power in the next wave of Web3 infrastructure.