The development team controls 5.2% of $SOLANUM (CA: AGBegePeNtnBy1xLGBDcBDjxaVHaDhvebSNMduLapump) with tokens locked for approximately 2919 days, while insider holdings account for just 2.6%. Notable feature: zero snipers detected in the distribution. Top holders include Bastille, xbtDLN, and RC—collectively maintaining significant positions in the ecosystem. On-chain analysis reveals an interesting pattern across holder clusters, with one concentration point holding 2.7% of total supply and another accounting for 2.3%. This relatively distributed structure suggests a healthier holder composition compared to projects with concentrated whale exposure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBandit
· 4h ago
ngl the distribution looks decent on paper but that 2919 day lockup? back in my mining days we'd call that "pretty to look at until it isn't" lol... when bitcoin was still mineable on gpu everyone had these grand vesting schedules too, then watch what happens when unlock approaches. gas fees gonna spike like crazy when people panic dump tbh
Reply0
Deconstructionist
· 4h ago
The distribution is okay, but why is the lock-up period of 2919 days so specific?
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapist
· 5h ago
Wow, only 5.2% for the development team? That's actually a pretty decent distribution.
The development team controls 5.2% of $SOLANUM (CA: AGBegePeNtnBy1xLGBDcBDjxaVHaDhvebSNMduLapump) with tokens locked for approximately 2919 days, while insider holdings account for just 2.6%. Notable feature: zero snipers detected in the distribution. Top holders include Bastille, xbtDLN, and RC—collectively maintaining significant positions in the ecosystem. On-chain analysis reveals an interesting pattern across holder clusters, with one concentration point holding 2.7% of total supply and another accounting for 2.3%. This relatively distributed structure suggests a healthier holder composition compared to projects with concentrated whale exposure.